Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows --skill reverse-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/reverse-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/reverse-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/reverse-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/reverse-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/reverse-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.02538 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01269 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00508 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00254 |
Grade A, and why
reverse-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 279 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 67000c829b5e
reverse-engineer is a skill published in the GitHub repository TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 2,538 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
keep-the-why
Extract and preserve the reasoning code cannot explain - decisions, rejected alternatives, workarounds, incidents, constraints - plus project setup and maintainer interviews. Not for what changed (see Keep a Changelog) - only why. Also the place for complaints, feedback and settings changes about this skill itself.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
sw-do
Implement a SpecWeave increment task by task through the ledger, with evidence per task and a verified close. Use for "implement this", "start working", "continue the increment", "keep going".
done
Close an increment: ledger check, specweave verify, optional review, then specweave complete. Use when all tasks are done and saying "close increment", "we are done", or "finish up".
summarize
A guide for turning conversations, logs, documents, or investigation notes into short, action-oriented summaries. It requires conclusions to be tied to available evidence and distinguishes confirmed facts from items still needing confirmation.
pre-modification-check
Use before modifying, refactoring, moving, or deleting files in a Repowise-indexed repository, especially shared utilities, core modules, public APIs, or files the user did not explicitly identify.