Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows --skill work-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/work-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/work-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/work-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/work-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trevoredris/fellowship-of-the-workflows/work-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01675 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00670 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
work-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 233 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 7bcc8bc76a1e
work-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository TrevorEdris/fellowship-of-the-workflows (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,675 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
Release Readiness Reviewer
Reviews a release candidate and produces a go/no-go readiness decision.
fresh-eyes-review
Structured pre-ship review covering security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, path traversal, command injection), logic errors (off-by-one, race conditions, null handling), business-rule correctness, and performance issues (N+1 queries, unbounded loops) — catches bugs that pass tests and blocks shipping until…
pr-workflow
Prepares branches and PRs for clean, reviewable merges.
address-github-comments-v2
Address GitHub Comments workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
GitHubレビューコメント対応（修正案つき）
A review workflow for handling comments on a GitHub pull request, which is a proposed code change. It groups comments by importance, records what remains unresolved, and prepares replies and small fix plans.
PR Standards
Pull request description, review depth, and merge standards so every PR carries enough context to review and merge safely.