Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojonpx agentmods add skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo/pr-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01089 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00436 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
pr-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Workflow Skill
Takes a working branch from "the code works" to "this is ready for a human reviewer": pre-flight checks, clean commits, a real description, self-review, and disciplined handling of feedback. Does NOT create draft "WIP" PRs that sit open for days.
When to Use
- Preparing a feature branch for review.
- Opening a pull request.
- Writing or rewriting a PR description.
- Restructuring commits before review.
- The user says "submit this" or "get this ready for review".
Prerequisites
gitconfigured with author identity.ghCLI authenticated for PR creation (or web access to the host).- The
powershelltool to rungit, the test suite, andscripts/verify.sh. - A green test suite on the branch.
How to Run
1. Pre-flight: tests green, working tree clean, scope reviewed.
2. Clean up commits with interactive rebase if needed.
3. Push the branch.
4. Open the PR with a structured description.
5. Self-review the diff (use the `code-review` skill).
6. Address feedback in new commits — do not force-push during active review.
Quick Reference
| Step | Command (run via powershell) |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-flight tests | npm test / pytest / go test ./... |
Must exit 0 |
| Dojo gate | bash scripts/verify.sh --check |
Must exit 0 |
| Clean tree | git status --porcelain |
Empty |
| Review scope | git diff main --stat |
Matches plan |
| Tidy history | git rebase -i main |
Optional, before push |
| Push | git push -u origin <branch> |
First push of branch |
| Open PR | gh pr create --fill then edit body |
Or use the GitHub UI |
Procedure
Step 1: Pre-Flight
Run via the powershell tool:
bash scripts/verify.sh --check
git status --porcelain
git diff main --stat
If anything fails, fix it before proceeding. A PR opened on a red branch wastes reviewer time.
Step 2: Clean Up Commits
Interactive rebase if the history is noisy:
git rebase -i main
Squash fixups. Reword unclear messages. Aim for a sequence that reads like a story:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A ccff4e00a396
pr-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository andreaswasita/copilot-agents-dojo (54 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,089 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Use when a green diff needs adversarial judgment in the rsc SDD chain, between verify and ship — give a review keyed to the spec/plan/constitution in 02-DOCS/wiki/sdd/, or receive one and verify each comment before agreeing. NOT running lint/type/tests (that is verify), NOT the spec-less standalone pass (that is…
review-this-branch
Run the nohuman review gate (fresh-session adversarial reviewer + tamper guard) over the current branch or a GitHub pull request, with no server, no database, and no onboarding, and relay the pass/fail checklist.
codeflow-maintainer
OpenClaw-only maintainer PR workflow modes and skills. For OpenCoven/coven PR creation, redirect to skills/pr-agent, the Coven PR Readiness Agent.
openclaw-dev
OpenClaw Dev Agent — OpenClaw-only docs-aware development assistant. For OpenCoven/coven PR creation, redirect to skills/pr-agent, the Coven PR Readiness Agent.
address-github-comments-v2
Address GitHub Comments workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs you need to address review or issue comments on an open GitHub Pull Request using the gh CLI and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
pr-lifecycle
Full PR lifecycle management: list, analyze, validate, and merge pull requests. Auto-detects validation gates per package and integrates a code-review pass for code analysis. Use when: managing PRs, checking PR status, reviewing open PRs, merging PRs, triaging PRs, cleaning up stale PRs, validating PR readiness, or…