Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill abusing-adcsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trilwu/secskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/abusing-adcs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/abusing-adcs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/abusing-adcs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.02452 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01226 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00490 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00245 |
Grade A, and why
abusing-adcs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Abusing AD CS
A certificate authority in an Active Directory domain is usually the shortest path from a standard user to domain administrator, because certificate templates are permission objects that almost nobody audits. A single template that lets the enrollee supply their own subject name is a full domain compromise, and it is the default on more networks than it should be.
Only against domains you are authorized to test.
When to Use
- The domain has a CA (
pKIEnrollmentServiceobjects exist) certipy findor BloodHound reports vulnerable templates- You have any domain credential and need a privilege escalation path
- You need durable domain persistence that survives a password reset
- Reviewing PKI configuration defensively
When NOT to Use
- General AD attacks (Kerberoasting, DCSync, lateral movement) — use
attacking-active-directory - Delegation abuse — use
attacking-kerberos-delegation - Entra ID / cloud PKI — use
attacking-entra-id - Detecting these attacks — use
engineering-detections; certificate request events (4886/4887) are the primary telemetry
Enumerate First
# Certipy — the standard tool; run this before anything else
certipy find -u [email protected] -p 'Password' -dc-ip 10.0.0.10 -vulnerable -stdout
certipy find -u [email protected] -p 'Password' -dc-ip 10.0.0.10 -old-bloodhound
# From Windows
Certify.exe find /vulnerable
Certify.exe cas # CA hosts, flags, and enrollment endpoints
certipy find -vulnerable names the ESC number directly, which is why it is
the first command. Read the output for: who can enroll, whether the requester
supplies the subject, which EKUs are present, and whether manager approval is
required.
The Escalation Paths
Grouped by what is misconfigured, because the fix and the detection differ.
Template misconfiguration — the common cases
| ID | Condition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ESC1 | Enrollee supplies subject (ENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECT) + client-auth EKU + low-priv enrollment + no approval |
Request a cert as any user, including a domain admin |
| ESC2 | Any Purpose EKU (or no EKU) + low-priv enrollment | Cert usable for client auth; same outcome as ESC1 |
| ESC3 | Certificate Request Agent EKU | Enroll on behalf of another user |
| ESC9 | CT_FLAG_NO_SECURITY_EXTENSION set |
Cert lacks the SID binding, enabling weak-mapping abuse |
| ESC15 | v1 template with enrollee-supplied subject, application policies injectable | Client auth via application policy, bypassing the EKU restriction |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 220 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A fb1654ae6f8d
abusing-adcs is a skill published in the GitHub repository trilwu/secskills (135 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 2,452 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude-md-improver
Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files in repositories. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix CLAUDE.md files. Scans for all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against templates, outputs quality report, then makes targeted updates. Also use when the user mentions "CLAUDE.md maintenance" or "project…
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
gke-reliability
Improves GKE workload reliability, using PDBs, health probes, and topology spread constraints. Use when configuring GKE workload reliability, setting up PDBs, or configuring GKE health probes (liveness, readiness, startup). Don't use for disaster recovery setup or full cluster backups (use gke-backup-dr instead).
gke-workload-security
Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (auditcluster.sh), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…