reporting-security-findings

reporting-security-findings is a skill for Claude Code from trilwu/secskills. It costs 66 tokens per session (3,088 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for writing security findings and assessment reports about vulnerabilities. It covers severity scores such as CVSS, business impact, reproducible proof of concept, fixes, executive summaries, and coordinated disclosure.

In plain words
What is it for?
Documenting individual vulnerabilities, producing penetration-test or code-audit reports, triaging bug-bounty submissions, prioritizing fixes, and preparing disclosure plans.
Why use it?
It turns technical evidence into a report that engineering teams, business owners, or bug-bounty reviewers can understand and verify.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the secskills-core plugin — 30 skills shipped together

Good fit Documenting individual vulnerabilities, producing penetration-test or code-audit reports, triaging bug-bounty submissions, prioritizing fixes, and preparing disclosure plans.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill reporting-security-findings
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trilwu/secskills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install secskills-core, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 30 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reporting-security-findings

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for reporting-security-findings

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/reporting-security-findings.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,088 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 82
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 105
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.03088
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01544
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00618
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00309

Measured 10d ago against content hash daee5c56c1bf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reporting-security-findings scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Makes network callslowCapability

Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

secskills-core/skills/reporting-security-findings/SKILL.md · 288 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Reporting Security Findings

The report is the product. Findings that are not understood are not fixed, and findings that cannot be reproduced are disputed. Most of the value an assessment creates is destroyed or preserved in the write-up.

When to Use

  • Writing up a single vulnerability
  • Producing a penetration test, code audit, or red team report
  • Submitting to a bug bounty program or triaging inbound submissions
  • Scoring severity and arguing priority with an engineering team
  • Planning coordinated disclosure for an unpatched issue

When NOT to Use

  • Finding the bug — use the relevant testing or audit skill first
  • Assembling the raw record a report is built from (provenance, artifact register, evidence, dead ends) — use maintaining-engagement-state; this skill consumes that record
  • Incident narratives and postmortems — use responding-to-incidents
  • Compliance-framework mapping as the primary goal — different document, different audience

Anatomy of a Finding

Every finding answers five questions, in this order:

### F-03  Tenant isolation bypass in report export     [High]

**Summary**
An authenticated user of any tenant can export reports belonging to other
tenants by supplying an arbitrary report ID to `GET /api/v2/reports/{id}/export`.

**Impact**
Full read access to other customers' report data, including the financial
figures and contact records those reports contain. Any customer account —
including a self-service trial — is sufficient. This is a cross-tenant
confidentiality breach with likely contractual and regulatory consequences.

**Affected**
`api/handlers/reports.go:214` (`handleExport`), deployed in production as of
commit `a1b2c3d`. Reproduced on staging 2026-07-24 14:02 UTC.

**Reproduction**
1. Authenticate as `trial-user@tenant-a` and obtain a session token.
2. Note your own report ID from `GET /api/v2/reports` (e.g. `1041`).
3. Request a neighbouring ID:
   curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \
        https://staging.example.com/api/v2/reports/1042/export -o out.csv
4. `out.csv` contains tenant B's data. Confirmed with IDs 1042, 1043, 1055.

**Root cause**
The handler looks the report up by primary key and checks only that the
session is valid. The tenant scope present on the list endpoint
(`WHERE tenant_id = ?`) is absent from the export query.

**Remediation**
Add the tenant predicate to the export lookup, and enforce it at the data
access layer rather than per handler so new endpoints inherit it:
    SELECT ... FROM reports WHERE id = ? AND tenant_id = ?
Then audit the remaining 14 handlers that call `findByID` without a scope —
listed in Appendix B.

**References**
CWE-639, OWASP API1:2023 Broken Object Level Authorization

Read the full file on GitHub · 288 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 288 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A daee5c56c1bf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reporting-security-findings is a skill published in the GitHub repository trilwu/secskills (138 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 3,088 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

claude-md-improver

Audit and improve CLAUDE.md files in repositories. Use when user asks to check, audit, update, improve, or fix CLAUDE.md files. Scans for all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against templates, outputs quality report, then makes targeted updates. Also use when the user mentions "CLAUDE.md maintenance" or "project…

anthropics/claude-plugins-official · 82 tokens

agent-platform-rag-engine-management

Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…

google/skills · 85 tokens

gke-workload-security

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (auditcluster.sh), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny…

google/skills · 181 tokens

gke-reliability

Improves GKE workload reliability, using PDBs, health probes, and topology spread constraints. Use when configuring GKE workload reliability, setting up PDBs, or configuring GKE health probes (liveness, readiness, startup). Don't use for disaster recovery setup or full cluster backups (use gke-backup-dr instead).

google/skills · 73 tokens

agent-platform-model-registry

Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.

google/skills · 60 tokens

google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog

Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…

google/skills · 138 tokens