Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill unpacking-protected-binariesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trilwu/secskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/unpacking-protected-binaries)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/unpacking-protected-binaries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/unpacking-protected-binaries/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trilwu/secskills/unpacking-protected-binaries"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trilwu/secskills/unpacking-protected-binaries.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Rogue Agent · line 50 Skill modifies its own code, configuration, or behavior at runtime. Self-modification enables an agent to escalate privileges, disable safety constraints, or install persistent backdoors.Fix: Prevent the skill from modifying its own code, SKILL.md, or configuration files. Treat skill files as read-only at runtime.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.02081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01040 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00416 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
unpacking-protected-binaries scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Unpacking Protected Binaries
Static unpacking is a trap for anything beyond UPX. The reliable method is to let the program unpack itself, then take the result out of memory. Almost every protector, however sophisticated, must eventually produce executable code in a readable page — that moment is what you are waiting for.
Run protected samples only in a contained environment; see analyzing-malware.
When to Use
binwalk -Eshows uniformly high entropy across most of the file- The import table has a handful of entries (
LoadLibrary,GetProcAddress) - Section names are absent, random, or
UPX0/.themida/.vmp0 - Disassembly shows a small stub and one large data blob
- A tool reports the file is packed, or analysis finds essentially no code
When NOT to Use
- The wider malware workflow — use
analyzing-malwarefor containment, triage, and IOC output; come back here for the unpacking step - .NET assemblies — use
analyzing-dotnet-assemblies, which covers .NET packers and managed memory dumping specifically - Obfuscation without packing (readable imports, normal entropy, confusing
control flow) — use
analyzing-binaries - Firmware images —
binwalk -Meextraction is a different job; seeanalyzing-binaries
Identify the Protector First
The response differs enormously between a commodity packer and a commercial protector, so spend a minute here.
diec target.exe # Detect It Easy — the best single identifier
rg -a -o 'UPX|MPRESS|Themida|VMProtect|ASPack|Enigma|Obsidium|PECompact' target.exe
binwalk -E target.exe # entropy profile
# Structural tells
readpe target.exe # or: rabin2 -S target.exe
# raw size ≈ 0 with large virtual size → section unpacked at runtime
# section marked writable AND executable → self-modifying
# entry point outside the first section → stub in a later section
# TLS callbacks present → code runs BEFORE the entry point
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 186 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A 3cb5edeaf4f1
unpacking-protected-binaries is a skill published in the GitHub repository trilwu/secskills (138 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 2,081 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
context-engineering
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
comet-memory
A review step for deciding whether information should become durable personal memory. It can keep, update, forget, or skip memory candidates based on bounded evidence.
recall-memory
Recall relevant long-term memories on demand. Given a topic or question, judges relevance from pre-loaded metadata, loads only relevant files, and returns a concise summary to the main agent.
agent-expert-creation
Create specialized agent experts with pre-loaded domain knowledge using the Act-Learn-Reuse pattern. Use when building domain-specific agents that maintain mental models via expertise files and self-improve prompts.
relevance-coarse-filter
Cheap, high-recall first-pass filter that removes obvious junk from a detector candidate pool before expensive story-origin research and PR judgment. Decides keep, monitoronly, or reject — never ranks, writes angles, verifies dates, or decides whether to pitch.
self-improve
Extract lessons from the current session, or sweep the project's past sessions when asked, and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to "self-improve", "distill this session", "distill past sessions", "sweep past…