Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add trkbt10/indexion-skills --skill indexion-refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trkbt10/indexion-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trkbt10/indexion-skills/indexion-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trkbt10/indexion-skills/indexion-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trkbt10/indexion-skills/indexion-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trkbt10/indexion-skills/indexion-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trkbt10/indexion-skills/indexion-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.03558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01779 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00712 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00356 |
Grade A, and why
indexion-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 337 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
indexion refactor — Codebase Refactoring
Detect and eliminate duplication at three levels — textual, structural, and conceptual — using indexion's analysis commands, then verify SoT is enforced.
When to Use
- After adding a new abstraction (type, module, API layer)
- After introducing a new file format or I/O boundary
- When a fix required touching 3+ files for the same reason
- When a "guard" or "skip" was added to work around a structural problem
- When
opendir,ENOENT, or similar filesystem errors appear from unexpected paths - When extracting shared code across packages
- When cleaning up after a refactor (removing trivial wrapper functions)
- Periodic SoT health check on a codebase
Three Levels of Duplication
| Level | What it is | Tool | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textual | Copy-pasted code blocks, identical functions | plan refactor |
is_whitespace copied across 5 modules |
| Structural | Same logic structure with different names | plan solid, plan unwrap |
cross-package extraction candidates, trivial wrappers |
| Conceptual | Same domain concept implemented independently | explore + manual analysis |
Three modules each deciding "is this file an archive?" |
Textual duplication is easy to find and fix. Conceptual duplication is the hardest and most dangerous — it produces no copy-paste matches but means changing one concept requires updating every scattered implementation.
Workflow
Phase 1: Clear textual duplication (plan refactor)
Start with high-confidence matches and work down.
# Step 1: Find 90%+ duplicates (high confidence)
indexion plan refactor --threshold=0.9 \
--include='*.mbt' --exclude='*_wbtest.mbt' \
--exclude='*moon.pkg*' --exclude='*pkg.generated*' \
cmd/indexion/
indexion plan refactor --threshold=0.9 \
--include='*.mbt' --exclude='*_wbtest.mbt' \
--exclude='*moon.pkg*' --exclude='*pkg.generated*' \
src/
Read the output in three sections:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 337 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 0130cde839d9
indexion-refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository trkbt10/indexion-skills (2 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 3,558 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…