Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TrueClicks/claude-plugins --skill skill-142-trademark-policy-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TrueClicks/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/trueclicks/claude-plugins/skill-142-trademark-policy-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trueclicks/claude-plugins/skill-142-trademark-policy-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trueclicks/claude-plugins/skill-142-trademark-policy-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/trueclicks/claude-plugins/skill-142-trademark-policy-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/trueclicks/claude-plugins/skill-142-trademark-policy-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00657 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00263 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
skill-142-trademark-policy-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill 142: Trademark Policy Management
Purpose
Audit ad copy for trademark usage, track authorization status for each trademark, and manage exemption requests. Proper trademark management prevents disapprovals, legal issues, and ensures legitimate use.
Data Requirements
Data Source: Standard + Custom GAQL
Standard Data:
data/account/campaigns/*/*/ads.md- Ad headlines and descriptions
GAQL Query (for trademark violations):
SELECT
campaign.name,
ad_group.name,
ad_group_ad.ad.id,
ad_group_ad.ad.responsive_search_ad.headlines,
ad_group_ad.ad.responsive_search_ad.descriptions,
ad_group_ad.policy_summary.approval_status,
ad_group_ad.policy_summary.policy_topic_entries
FROM ad_group_ad
WHERE ad_group_ad.status = 'ENABLED'
AND ad_group_ad.policy_summary.approval_status = 'DISAPPROVED'
Run via /google-ads:get-custom with query name trademark_violations.
Analysis Steps
- Scan ad copy: Identify brand names and potential trademarks in ads
- Check disapprovals: Filter for TRADEMARKS policy violations
- Audit authorization: Verify exemption status for each trademark used
- Assess risk: Flag unauthorized trademark usage
- Track exemptions: Monitor pending and approved exemption requests
Thresholds
| Condition | Severity |
|---|---|
| Using competitor trademark without exemption | Critical |
| Trademark disapproval on active ad | Critical |
| Exemption expiring within 30 days | Warning |
| Using trademark without documentation | Warning |
| Trademark in display URL path | Info |
Output
Short format (default):
## Trademark Policy Audit
**Account:** [Name] | **Trademarks Used:** [X] | **Issues:** [Y]
### Trademark Usage Summary
| Trademark | Ads Using | Authorization | Status |
|-----------|-----------|---------------|--------|
| [Brand A] | [X] | Reseller | Approved |
| [Brand B] | [Y] | None | Risk |
| [Brand C] | [Z] | Pending | Under Review |
### Trademark Violations
- **[Campaign/AdGroup]**: "[Trademark]" in headline → Remove or get exemption
### Exemption Status
| Trademark | Type | Status | Expiration |
|-----------|------|--------|------------|
| [Brand] | Reseller | Active | [Date] |
### Action Items
1. Remove unauthorized trademark from [X] ads
2. Request exemption for [Y] trademarks
3. Renew exemption for [Z] before [Date]
### Recommendations
1. Maintain exemption documentation
2. Create trademark-free ad variants as backup
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 91 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 2bc54ab4a053
skill-142-trademark-policy-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository TrueClicks/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 657 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-08.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…