code-review

code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code. It costs 35 tokens per session (1,103 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of code-review, MIT.

A code-review guide for examining software for security problems, bugs, performance issues, and maintainability concerns.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review changes or audit a codebase, including checks for injection risks, weak authentication, logic errors, race conditions, resource leaks, slow database access, and dependency vulnerabilities.
Why use it?
It provides a checklist for finding problems that are easy to miss when reviewing code informally.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review changes or audit a codebase, including checks for injection risks, weak authentication, logic errors, race conditions, resource leaks, slow database access, and dependency vulnerabilities.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,103 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.01103
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00551
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00221
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00110

Measured 9d ago against content hash a64c8c43b496, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Runs shell commandslowCapability

Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.

os.system(f"ls {user_input}")
Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to code-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 158 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Skill

You now have expertise in conducting comprehensive code reviews. Follow this structured approach:

Review Checklist

1. Security (Critical)

Check for:

  • Injection vulnerabilities: SQL, command, XSS, template injection
  • Authentication issues: Hardcoded credentials, weak auth
  • Authorization flaws: Missing access controls, IDOR
  • Data exposure: Sensitive data in logs, error messages
  • Cryptography: Weak algorithms, improper key management
  • Dependencies: Known vulnerabilities (check with npm audit, pip-audit)
# Quick security scans
npm audit                    # Node.js
pip-audit                    # Python
cargo audit                  # Rust
grep -r "password\|secret\|api_key" --include="*.py" --include="*.js"

2. Correctness

Check for:

  • Logic errors: Off-by-one, null handling, edge cases
  • Race conditions: Concurrent access without synchronization
  • Resource leaks: Unclosed files, connections, memory
  • Error handling: Swallowed exceptions, missing error paths
  • Type safety: Implicit conversions, any types

3. Performance

Check for:

  • N+1 queries: Database calls in loops
  • Memory issues: Large allocations, retained references
  • Blocking operations: Sync I/O in async code
  • Inefficient algorithms: O(n^2) when O(n) possible
  • Missing caching: Repeated expensive computations

4. Maintainability

Check for:

  • Naming: Clear, consistent, descriptive
  • Complexity: Functions > 50 lines, deep nesting > 3 levels
  • Duplication: Copy-pasted code blocks
  • Dead code: Unused imports, unreachable branches
  • Comments: Outdated, redundant, or missing where needed

5. Testing

Check for:

  • Coverage: Critical paths tested
  • Edge cases: Null, empty, boundary values
  • Mocking: External dependencies isolated
  • Assertions: Meaningful, specific checks

Read the full file on GitHub · 158 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 158 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A a64c8c43b496

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository truongpx396/learn-harness-engineering-by-building-mini-claude-code (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,103 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 100% identical to code-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

md-audit

Read-only code quality audit — scan the current working directory for common issues (bugs, dead code, security hotspots, missing error handling) and return a prioritised findings report. No files are edited. Use when asked to "audit the code", "quick audit", "find issues", "code scan", or "what's wrong with this…

chaitanyagiri/munder-difflin · 85 tokens

comet-verify

Comet Phase 4: Verify and Close. Invoke with /comet-verify. Verify implementation matches design, handle development branch.

rpamis/comet · 32 tokens

comet-review

A read-only review guide for checking the current Comet change, a managed software-change workflow. It focuses on correctness, security, and boundary problems without changing files or advancing the workflow.

rpamis/comet · 30 tokens

advisor-orchestrator-worker

Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap…

Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps · 100 tokens

comet-github-pr-review

A read-only review process for pull requests in Comet's GitHub repositories. A pull request is a proposed code change; the review checks its current code, related issue, comments, merge status, and automated checks.

rpamis/comet · 69 tokens

load-pr-review

Load GitHub PR review comments into AI session — analyze, triage, plan. Default: analysis-only (no auto-fix). Use when: reviewing PR feedback, planning fixes, addressing review comments, replying to reviewers. Not for: creating reviews (use codex-review-fast), creating PRs (use create-pr), viewing PR status (use…

sd0xdev/sd0x-harness · 77 tokens