Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tsale/awesome-dfir-skills --skill admiralty-system-trgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tsale/awesome-dfir-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsale/awesome-dfir-skills/admiralty-system-tr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsale/awesome-dfir-skills/admiralty-system-tr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tsale/awesome-dfir-skills/admiralty-system-tr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tsale/awesome-dfir-skills/admiralty-system-tr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tsale/awesome-dfir-skills/admiralty-system-tr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 31 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00207 | $0.02867 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00103 | $0.01434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00573 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
admiralty-system scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Admiralty System for CTI
The Admiralty System (NATO AJP-2.1) is the gold standard for assessing intelligence. The British Royal Navy developed it in the early 20th century. NATO intelligence communities now use it worldwide, and it is gaining ground in cyber threat intelligence.
It rates two things, separately:
- Source Reliability (A to F): how trustworthy the origin is
- Information Credibility (1 to 6): how trustworthy the data is, independent of the source
The combined output is an alphanumeric code such as A1, B3, F6.
Core rule: assess source and information SEPARATELY
This is the single most common mistake. A source who is reliable on malware analysis is not automatically reliable on geopolitics. A piece of information can be true from a sketchy source, or false from a usually reliable one. Always rate them independently, never in lockstep.
Second common mistake: confusing "two vendors reported it" with two independent sources. If both vendors pull from the same original dataset (the same breach forum post, the same scan, the same leak), that is ONE source. Independent corroboration means independent collection.
Source Reliability Scale (A to F)
| Code | Label | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| A | Completely Reliable | Source has consistently delivered accurate information over a long history on this specific topic. Reserve this rating; it is rare. |
| B | Usually Reliable | Source has a strong track record with only minor lapses on this topic |
| C | Fairly Reliable | Source has produced accurate information before but the track record is shorter or mixed |
| D | Not Usually Reliable | Source has been wrong more often than right, but cannot be fully dismissed |
| E | Unreliable | Source has a clear history of inaccuracy, deception, or manipulation |
| F | Reliability Cannot be Judged | New source, no track record, or insufficient access to assess |
Attributes to weigh:
- History of accuracy on this specific topic (not other topics)
- Proximity to the event (firsthand, secondhand, hearsay)
- Technical skill in the domain
- Motivation (financial gain, reputation, ideology, deception)
- Identity corroboration (links to known infrastructure or aliases)
- Forum reputation score, post count, join date
- Administrator or moderator status on the forum
- Documented links to other known threat actors or breaches
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 238 lines · 207 tokens per session scan A e80d7a832ec5
admiralty-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository tsale/awesome-dfir-skills (321 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 207 tokens to every session and 2,867 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…