Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template --skill kimi-peer-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/kimi-peer-writer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/kimi-peer-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/kimi-peer-writer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/kimi-peer-writer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/kimi-peer-writer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 5 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Supply Chain · line 436 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
- high Supply Chain · line 436 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 42 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 57 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.11536 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.05768 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01154 |
Grade A, and why
kimi-peer-writer scanned grade A with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Если /verify не подходит (например, CLI-only без UI) — напиши и запусти точечный smoke (pytest fixture / curl call / минимальный python script). Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
result = subprocess.run( How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 924 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kimi Peer Writer (DP.SC.154)
Задача: $ARGUMENTS
Архитектура: я (Kimi) = писатель, Claude = напарник. Claude вызывается через
claude-peer-adapter.shнапрямую — Bash tool, stdin pipe.list_peer_statuses(Local Gateway) — координация файлов, не проверка доступности Claude CLI. Gateway offline ≠ Claude недоступен.
When to use
Peer-сессия DP.SC.154 где Kimi = писатель, Claude = напарник. Запускается простой фразой. Включает ОРЗ Opening и Closing, turn-loop, эскалации, Decision Gate (зафиксировать vs реализовать → ревью → проверить → задеплоить), отложенную финализацию и верификацию.
Scope boundary — не подменяет решения, зарезервированные за пилотом (найдено 2026-07-07)
Peer-сессия пригодна для: технических решений, дизайна, code review, поиска компромисса между подходами, подготовки кандидатов к решению. НЕ пригодна для решений, которые процесс явно закрепляет за человеком (например, R15 Валидатор в
/apply-captures— accept/reject/defer кандидатов знания; R1 Стратег — приоритеты месяца). Согласие двух агентов между собой — не решение пилота, даже единогласное и хорошо обоснованное.Если задача внутри пир-сессии требует такого решения — писатель обязан остановиться и спросить пилота напрямую в текущем чате (не через turn-файл), прежде чем фиксировать результат. См.
.claude/skills/apply-captures/SKILL.mdраздел «R15 = живой пилот, не агент» и${IWE_GOVERNANCE_REPO:-DS-strategy}/inbox/bugs/bug-2026-07-07-r15-decisions-bypassed-pilot.md— прецедент, из-за которого добавлено это ограничение.
Шаг 0. Режим
Определить режим из $ARGUMENTS:
--list→ прочитать${IWE_GOVERNANCE_REPO:-DS-strategy}/sessions/00-index.md, вывести таблицу. Стоп.--interrupt <id>→ перейти к Шагу 5 (interrupt-режим). Стоп после.--finalize <id>→ перейти к Шагу 6 (finalize-режим). Стоп после.- Иначе → новая сессия, продолжать к Шагу 0б.
Шаг 0а. Preflight Gate (WP-484 Ф33 item Г, обязательно ДО любых других действий)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +1 lines 062556dc1fff
- 11d ago First seen · 923 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 346be37334a2
kimi-peer-writer is a skill published in the GitHub repository TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template (51 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 11,536 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 2 findings (makes network calls, runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-management-debugging
Systematic debugging — a four-phase root-cause methodology, boundary instrumentation for multi-component systems, the 3-fix escalation rule, and a verification gate to run before claiming anything is fixed. Use on any test failure, production bug, build failure, performance regression, or integration glitch, and…
team-management-receiving-feedback
How to receive code review as technical evaluation rather than social performance — verify claims against the codebase before implementing, push back with evidence, and drop the performative agreement. Use when responding to a human reviewer, a PR comment, or another AI reviewer, and when deciding whether a suggestion…
team-management-tdd-discipline
Test-driven development discipline — when TDD applies, when forcing it is wrong, and the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop with an explicit "watch it fail" step. Use when writing or reviewing tests, fixing a bug, changing behaviour, or deciding whether a change needs a test at all. Triggers on bug fixes, new validation or…
data-profiling
Use BEFORE dispatching any subagent that needs to understand the dataset. Generates a high-density, PII-free data profile in Markdown so subagents receive structured context instead of raw data.
leakage-guard
Use whenever building features for time-series or any temporal dataset. Enforces strict temporal integrity: no future data in features, no post-event information, correct CV strategy.
verification-before-delivery
Use when any analysis, model, or report is claimed to be complete. Runs mandatory artifact integrity, statistical evidence, and reproducibility checks before any delivery.