Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-templatenpx agentmods add skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tserentserenov/fmt-exocortex-template/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium analysis-evasion · line 1 Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script contentFix: Review the flagged content for security risks. Ensure no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data are exposed.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.06005 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.03002 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00600 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 368 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Верификация артефакта
Роль: VR.R.001 Верификатор (PACK-verification) Принцип: Context isolation (VR.SOTA.002) — проверяю результат по эталону, НЕ процесс создания. Архитектура: Ядро (Pack, фиксированное) + Контекст (переменный) — AS.D.004.
Аргументы: $ARGUMENTS
When to use
Верификация артефакта по эталону из Pack. Загружает роль VR.R.001 (Верификатор) с context isolation — проверяет результат, а не процесс создания.
Algorithm
Extensions before
bash .claude/scripts/load-extensions.sh verify before
Код 0 → прочитать каждый путь в алфавитном порядке и выполнить инструкции до
выбора типа проверки. Код 1 → расширений нет. Любой другой код или ошибка
обязательного шага расширения → верификацию не начинать и показать настоящую
причину.
Шаг 0. Определить тип проверки
| Аргумент | Тип | Что проверяет |
|---|---|---|
code |
Проверка кода | Качество кода: логика, edge cases, безопасность, coupling |
archgate |
Проверка реализации АрхГейта | Код соответствует ЭМОГССБ-оценке, принципы воплощены |
capture |
Проверка capture-candidate | UL, полнота, непротиворечивость с Pack |
pack |
Проверка Package-адекватности | Проверяет 11 координат E.4.DPF.DA seed-пакета (Ф1-Ф3 артефакты): SoTA, decision-record, seed-маркер, их достаточность. Используется из /verify pack или pack-creator Шаг 4 |
wp |
Приёмка рабочего продукта | Критерии done из WP context file |
chain |
Data flow check | Прочитаны ли downstream consumers? Контракты совпадают? (CoVe stage 3) |
adversarial |
Scope & bias check | Scope определён анализом или выводом? Что НЕ прочитано? (Pre-mortem) |
subsection |
Проверка подраздела руководства (SS) | 🔴 v4-lint + 🟡 нарратив/дуга/практика/аналогия (G-L) по CHECKLIST-subsection-v1.md |
section |
Проверка раздела руководства (S) | 🔴 v4-lint section + 🟡 связность SS, дуга по ступеням, охват темы (D-H) по CHECKLIST-section-v1.md |
guide |
Проверка руководства целиком | 🔴 v4-lint guide + 🟡 целостность объекта, дуга, охват узлов мастерства, эпилог (E-I) по CHECKLIST-guide-v1.md |
auto или пусто |
Автоопределение | По типу файла и контексту сессии |
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed 872c7043f4bf
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines 988329960780
- 9d ago First seen · 367 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A e09e16a9969e
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template (50 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 6,005 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-management-tdd-discipline
Test-driven development discipline — when TDD applies, when forcing it is wrong, and the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop with an explicit "watch it fail" step. Use when writing or reviewing tests, fixing a bug, changing behaviour, or deciding whether a change needs a test at all. Triggers on bug fixes, new validation or…
leakage-guard
Use whenever building features for time-series or any temporal dataset. Enforces strict temporal integrity: no future data in features, no post-event information, correct CV strategy.
test-driven-data-science
Use before any training step to enforce three-layer data validation: Physical (schema), Logical (business rules), Statistical (distribution drift). Blocks training if any CRITICAL assertion fails.
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
ap-execharness-resolver
L3 executor - EXECHARNESS RESOLVE. Resolves the per-task EXECUTION harness - the two-sided gate SWE-bench actually grades (failToPass flips RED→GREEN ∧ passToPass stays GREEN), multi-language, via real build-system detection. Ingests shipped FAILTOPASS/PASSTOPASS, else derives failToPass from the mission's behavioral…