Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/tslateman/duet/grill-with-docsnpx skills add tslateman/duet --skill grill-with-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tslateman/duetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tslateman/duet/grill-with-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tslateman/duet/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tslateman/duet/grill-with-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00953 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00477 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
grill-with-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Grill With Docs
Interview the user relentlessly about every aspect of the plan until you reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one at a time. For each question, propose your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Domain awareness
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
Create files lazily, only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y, which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account', do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 96 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A c69d67436967
grill-with-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository tslateman/duet (1 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 953 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
to-plan
Capture the chat into .task/task/ .md with ## Description plus ## Plan (Goal/Touches/Logic) — the deepest one-task capture.
roadmap-to-workflow
Fan an approved .task/roadmap/ .md out to a dynamic Workflow — parallel planning, serialized implementation, dependency-ordered waves.
self-improve
Self-improve this skills repo — surface and (safely) apply quality improvements across four parallel read-only lenses (Clarity, Leanness, Coverage, Ergonomics). Sibling of /self-audit — audit fixes rule violations, improve raises quality where no rule is broken. Local meta-skill, independent of the /task: pipeline.
to-roadmap
Capture a multi-task initiative into .task/roadmap/ .md — a phase-grouped backlog of ready-to-pick-up items.
to-task
Capture the chat (or a roadmap item) into .task/task/ .md — ## Description only, no ## Plan.
self-audit
Self-audit this skills repo against CLAUDE.md invariants, the artifact contract, and README/CLAUDE.md/docs sync via three parallel read-only subagents. Local meta-skill — independent of the /task: pipeline.