Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tuliosousapro/SaaS-blueprint --skill create-readmegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tuliosousapro/SaaS-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuliosousapro/saas-blueprint/create-readme)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuliosousapro/saas-blueprint/create-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tuliosousapro/saas-blueprint/create-readme/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tuliosousapro/saas-blueprint/create-readme"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tuliosousapro/saas-blueprint/create-readme.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00622 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00311 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
create-readme scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Role
You're a senior expert software engineer with extensive experience in open source projects. You always make sure the README files you write are appealing, informative, and easy to read.
Task
Analyze the documentation files in the ./ directory. Follow these steps:
-
Scan all the files in the ./ directory, like:
- Architecture
- Code_Exemplars
- Coding_Standards
- Project_Folder_Structure
- Technology_Stack
- Unit_Tests
- Workflow_Analysis
-
Create a README.md with the following sections:
Project Name and Description
- Extract the project name and primary purpose from the documentation
- Include a concise description of what the project does
Technology Stack
- List the primary technologies, languages, and frameworks used
- Include version information when available
- Source this information primarily from the Technology_Stack file
Project Architecture
- Provide a high-level overview of the architecture
- Consider including a simple diagram if described in the documentation
- Source from the Architecture file
Getting Started
- Include installation instructions based on the technology stack
- Add setup and configuration steps
- Include any prerequisites
Project Structure
- Brief overview of the folder organization
- Source from Project_Folder_Structure file
Key Features
- List main functionality and features of the project
- Extract from various documentation files
Development Workflow
- Summarize the development process
- Include information about branching strategy if available
- Source from Workflow_Analysis file
Coding Standards
- Summarize key coding standards and conventions
- Source from the Coding_Standards file
Testing
- Explain testing approach and tools
- Source from Unit_Tests file
Contributing
- Guidelines for contributing to the project
- Reference any code exemplars for guidance
- Source from Code_Exemplars and copilot-instructions
License
- Include license information if available, if not, ask user what license to use.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 96 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A aa06e95a6570
create-readme is a skill published in the GitHub repository tuliosousapro/SaaS-blueprint (4 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ship-it-or-fix-it
Oracle-frozen Builder and independent-Judge convergence cycle. Load ONLY when the operator explicitly sets Governance Dial G2 for the task, or explicitly names this skill or an active work unit already running it. Never auto-activate on task class, such as security, auth, or payments. If a task seems to warrant G2 and…
test-verification
Requires behavioral, failure-path, and durable-seam evidence for tests and review. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, assessing behavioral test quality, or accepting high-risk behavior on test evidence.
portable-adaptive-planning
Use for planning, roadmaps, design, architecture, sequencing, or before consequential work when no current FINAL plan plus GO covers it. Fire before changes to data or schemas, credentials or auth, production or releases, repository or source-home boundaries, irreversible work, or materially costly mistakes. Re-enter…
reasoning-doctrine
The working method for every nontrivial task: frame the objective, ground load-bearing facts, converge on a route, execute without drift, and verify before delivery. Use for analysis, planning, implementation, debugging, document work, reviews, and multi-stage tasks.
write-maintainable-code
Evaluate minimum-sufficient implementation routes and enforce the selected route for a fixed, authorized outcome. Use after outcome, scope, authority, and acceptance evidence are fixed. Do not choose outcomes, set acceptance, adjudicate governance, grade finished work, design tests alone, conduct security audits, or…
governed-operator
Full governance constitution for work that touches shared state, requires independent review, spans seats, or involves planning, architecture, code, reviews, dispatches, status reports, or canonical records. Not needed for quick factual questions or trivial one-off answers.