med-paper-assistant: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/concept-development/SKILL.md

concept-development is a skill for Claude Code from u9401066/med-paper-assistant. It costs 74 tokens per session (1,296 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A research-concept development workflow that combines literature searches, concept writing, originality checks, and reviewer-style feedback. It keeps marked novelty statements and key selling points protected during later writing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to develop or expand a research concept, find supporting literature, save references, validate originality, analyse weaknesses, and synchronise citations.
Why use it?
It helps identify weak research questions and unsupported claims before they reach a paper draft. It also provides concrete ways to address criticism instead of hiding it.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is u9401066/med-paper-assistant's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on med-paper-assistant itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything med-paper-assistant configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/med-paper-assistant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/master/.claude/skills/concept-development/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for concept-development

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for concept-development

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-development.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 74 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,296 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00074 $0.01296
Opus 5.5 $0.00030 $0.00518
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00259
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00130

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a3b5dbab66f5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

concept-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/concept-development/SKILL.md · 120 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

研究概念發展技能

核心哲學:像頂尖 Reviewer 一樣犀利

  • 直指問題核心 — 不繞彎、不糖衣
  • 用證據說話 — 「你說 X,但文獻顯示 Y」
  • 提出 Reviewer 會問的問題 — 讓作者無法反駁
  • 給具體修復方案 — 不是「可以考慮」,而是「加入這句話」

黃金法則

  1. 永遠先問用戶 — 不自動修改 NOVELTY/SELLING_POINTS
  2. 犀利但建設性 — 嚴格導師,非敵人
  3. 用戶說「直接寫」就開始 — 尊重決定
  4. 反覆修改 = 危險信號 — 改兩次沒改善就停下討論

工具

工具 用途
read_draft / write_draft 讀寫 concept.md
validate_for_section ⭐ 針對特定 section 驗證
validate_concept 完整驗證(犀利回饋)
list_saved_references 檢視文獻
save_reference_mcp 儲存文獻(永遠優先)
sync_references 同步 wikilinks → References
mcp_cgu_deep_think CGU 深度分析弱點

完整流程

Phase 1: 文獻搜尋

unified_search() → fetch_article_details() → 分析 Research Gap

Phase 2: 專案建立

project_action(action="create") → save_reference_mcp(pmid)

Phase 3: 概念撰寫

用 concept.md template 撰寫:Research Question, 🔒 NOVELTY STATEMENT, Methods Overview, 🔒 KEY SELLING POINTS

Phase 4: 驗證與迭代

validate_concept() → 犀利回饋 → 三選項(直接寫/修正/用 CGU)


🔒 Protected Content

標記 規則
🔒 NOVELTY STATEMENT 不可刪除或弱化。Introduction 必須呼應
🔒 KEY SELLING POINTS 必須全部保留。Discussion 必須強調

Agent 修改前必須問用戶確認。


Novelty Score 低的處理(犀利回饋模式)

禁止:自動改 NOVELTY、反覆追分、討好式回饋

正確流程:

  1. 給犀利回饋(具體問題 + Reviewer 會問什麼 + 修復方案)
  2. 給三選項:✅ 直接寫 | 🔧 修正問題 | 🤖 用 CGU 想

犀利回饋模式

Pattern 問題 Reviewer 問 修復
聲稱「首次」沒證據 沒文獻搜尋紀錄 搜尋策略是什麼? 加入 PubMed 搜尋紀錄
模糊量化 「更好」沒數字 好多少?顯著嗎? 改為具體數值/OR/CI
引用沒說限制 有 ref 但沒指出 gap 貢獻在哪? 加入 ref 的具體限制

Read the full file on GitHub · 120 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a3b5dbab66f5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

concept-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/med-paper-assistant (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,296 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

citation-manager

Format and manage citations — APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, and Vancouver styles with BibTeX export.

inbharatai/claude-skills · 25 tokens

nav-loop

Run tasks until complete with structured completion signals. Auto-invoke when user says "run until done", "keep going until complete", "iterate until finished", "loop mode", "autonomous mode".

qf-studio/navigator · 43 tokens

nav-skill-creator

Analyze codebase patterns and create custom skills for repetitive workflows. Use when project needs automation or pattern enforcement. Auto-invoke when user says "create a skill for...", "automate this workflow", or "we keep doing X manually".

qf-studio/navigator · 53 tokens

visual-regression

Setup visual regression testing with Storybook stories, configuration, and CI/CD workflows. Supports Chromatic, Percy, BackstopJS. Auto-invoke when user says "set up visual regression", "add Chromatic tests", "add screenshot testing", or "set up Percy".

qf-studio/navigator · 59 tokens

example-feature-generator

Generate boilerplate for new features following project conventions. Use when user says "create feature", "add feature", or "new feature scaffolding".

qf-studio/navigator · 33 tokens

manuscript-reframe

Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 53 tokens