Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to u9401066/med-paper-assistant. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/master/.claude/skills/concept-validation/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/u9401066/med-paper-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-validation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-validation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-validation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/u9401066/med-paper-assistant/concept-validation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01149 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00460 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00230 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
concept-validation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Concept Validation Skill
核心規則
- 寫任何草稿前必須通過
validate_concept()（除 concept.md 本身） - Novelty Score ≥ 75（3 輪皆須達標）才算通過
- 失敗時犀利回饋 + 給選項（直接寫？修正？用 CGU？）→ 禁止討好式回饋或自動改 NOVELTY
工具
| Tool | 用途 | 何時用 |
|---|---|---|
validate_concept |
完整 3 輪驗證 + novelty 計分 | 首次驗證、修改 concept 後 |
validate_concept_quick |
結構性快速檢查（不評分） | 草稿階段快速確認 |
validate_for_section |
針對特定 section 驗證 | 寫 Introduction/Methods 前 |
Novelty 評分標準
| 分數 | 意義 | 行動 |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | 高度創新，強賣點 | ✅ 直接寫 |
| 75-89 | 足夠創新 | ✅ 可寫，建議微調 |
| 60-74 | 創新不足 | ⚠️ 需修改 concept |
| <60 | 缺乏創新 | ❌ 必須重構或用 CGU |
各 Paper Type 驗證重點
| Paper Type | 必要元素 | 驗證重點 |
|---|---|---|
| original-research | Hypothesis, NOVELTY, Methods, SELLING POINTS | 假說可測、方法可行 |
| case-report | Case presentation, NOVELTY, Learning points | 罕見性或新見解 |
| review-article | Scope, NOVELTY, Framework | 新觀點或新整合 |
| meta-analysis | PICO, Search strategy, NOVELTY | 差異化分析角度 |
| technical-note | Innovation, NOVELTY, Clinical impact | 技術新穎性 |
| letter-to-editor | Key argument, NOVELTY | 觀點獨特性 |
| brief-communication | Key finding, NOVELTY | 發現重要性 |
concept.md 必要結構
# Research Concept
## Background（為什麼重要）
## 🔒 NOVELTY STATEMENT（創新點，不可刪弱）
## Research Question / Hypothesis
## Methods Overview
## 🔒 KEY SELLING POINTS（賣點，Discussion 必強調）
## Target Journal（選填）
🔒 保護內容規則
🔒 NOVELTY STATEMENT：不可弱化或刪除，全稿須體現🔒 KEY SELLING POINTS：Discussion 必須強調所有賣點- 違反 → Hook P5 阻止 commit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A c4e03f8e7971
concept-validation is a skill published in the GitHub repository u9401066/med-paper-assistant (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,149 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
citation-manager
Format and manage citations — APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, and Vancouver styles with BibTeX export.
nav-loop
Run tasks until complete with structured completion signals. Auto-invoke when user says "run until done", "keep going until complete", "iterate until finished", "loop mode", "autonomous mode".
nav-skill-creator
Analyze codebase patterns and create custom skills for repetitive workflows. Use when project needs automation or pattern enforcement. Auto-invoke when user says "create a skill for...", "automate this workflow", or "we keep doing X manually".
visual-regression
Setup visual regression testing with Storybook stories, configuration, and CI/CD workflows. Supports Chromatic, Percy, BackstopJS. Auto-invoke when user says "set up visual regression", "add Chromatic tests", "add screenshot testing", or "set up Percy".
example-feature-generator
Generate boilerplate for new features following project conventions. Use when user says "create feature", "add feature", or "new feature scaffolding".
manuscript-reframe
Reframe report-like academic drafts into paper-form scientific arguments while preserving or explicitly renegotiating author intent; requires an approved old-versus-proposed spine, evidence and argument baselines, analysis-role control, and post-edit drift review.