Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uk-agents/uk-legal-pluginsnpx agentmods add skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins/tabular-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00124 | $0.03636 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01818 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00727 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00364 |
Grade A, and why
tabular-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/tabular-review
- Load
~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/corporate-legal-uk/CLAUDE.md→ diligence structure, thresholds, house format. - Confirm: what documents, what columns, where does the output go.
- Build the typed schema. Write
.review-schema.yaml. Confirm with the user. - Sample run (3–5 docs). Adjust schema. Confirm.
- Fan out — one sub-agent per document, parallel. Each cell: value + state + verbatim quote + location.
- Normalisation pass. Flag outliers and inconsistencies.
- Output:
.xlsxor Google Sheets (ask which), plus.csv+_sources.csv+ markdown always. Work-product header. - Summary: verification workload (counts of not_present / unclear / needs_review per column), flagged columns, where the files are, reminder that every cell is a lead not a finding.
/corporate-legal-uk:tabular-review
/corporate-legal-uk:tabular-review --schema .review-schema.yaml --docs ./vdr/02-Contracts/
/corporate-legal-uk:tabular-review --template ma-diligence-uk
--schema <path>: Use an existing schema file instead of building one. Useful for re-runs and incremental additions.
--template <name>: Start from a template in references/. Currently: ma-diligence-uk.
--docs <path>: Document source. A local folder, a Drive folder ID, or a VDR path. If omitted, asks.
--output <xlsx|gsheets|csv>: Output format. If omitted, asks.
--sample <n>: Sample size for the schema check. Default 5.
Matter context
Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /corporate-legal-uk:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/uk-legal-plugins/corporate-legal-uk/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 238 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A f1ba2040fd24
tabular-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository uk-agents/uk-legal-plugins (9 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 3,636 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
brand-safety-compliance
Scans outbound copy or creator-submitted content for 6 compliance red lines — medical/efficacy, exaggeration/absolute, beauty-permanence, financial/income, fake-scarcity, fake-rapport — and returns a block/warn verdict with fix suggestions. Use when the user asks to check, scan, review, or vet copy before sending, or…
blind
แทนที่ข้อมูล sensitive ในเอกสารด้วยข้อมูลสมมติที่ดูสมจริง (pseudonymization) — รักษารูปแบบและโครงสร้างเดิมไว้ แต่ข้อมูลจริงถูกซ่อนทั้งหมด รองรับทุกประเภทเอกสาร: ข้อความทั่วไป, เอกสารราชการ, ตาราง Excel/CSV, PPTX, รายงานการเงิน ใช้เมื่อผู้ใช้ต้องการซ่อน ปิดบัง หรือสลับข้อมูลจริงออก เช่น "ช่วย blind ข้อมูลนี้"…
corporate-docs
La parte densa. Y la que más se arma mal, porque se mezclan tres cosas distintas.
doc-review
Casi ninguna empresa parte de cero. Parte de una plantilla que alguien copió y nadie volvió a mirar.
subcontract-writer
Generate a complete subcontract from a firm's template, awarded bid, and project specs. Outputs a Word document. Triggers: 'subcontract', 'sub agreement', 'write contract', 'draft subcontract'. Requires awarded bid.
diligence-issue-extraction
Read VDR documents and extract issues per house categories and materiality thresholds, producing findings in house memo format. Use when user says "review the data room", "extract issues from [folder]", "diligence review", "what's in the VDR", or points at VDR documents.