technical-unit-assessment

technical-unit-assessment is a skill for Claude Code from ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit. It costs 35 tokens per session (500 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An evidence-based review of a technical area such as a frontend, backend, infrastructure, data platform, mobile app, or AI pipeline. It scores only areas supported by evidence and marks the rest as not assessed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess a repository, service, platform, pipeline, or other technical workload and produce a confidence-aware scorecard.
Why use it?
It reduces guesswork in technical health reviews and makes missing information visible. The results inform decisions without making those decisions for the team.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the agent-toolkit-complete plugin — 106 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to assess a repository, service, platform, pipeline, or other technical workload and produce a confidence-aware scorecard.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit --skill technical-unit-assessment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install agent-toolkit-complete, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 106 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for technical-unit-assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for technical-unit-assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit/technical-unit-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 500 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00500
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00200
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00100
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00050

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 676a0fb1c91a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

technical-unit-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/agent-toolkit-complete/.github/skills/technical-unit-assessment/SKILL.md · 59 lines

What it actually says

Technical Unit Assessment (WHAT)

Assess a technical unit: frontend app, backend API, data platform, infrastructure/IaC scope, mobile app, AI/ML pipeline, or another technical workload.

Run project-assessment-evidence first. Use project-assessment as the router for multi-unit assessments.

Out of scope

  • Does NOT score indicators without evidence — mark as Not assessed
  • Does NOT make technical decisions — scores inform, humans decide
  • Does NOT produce final report without output-handshake

Unit intake

Ask before scoring:

  • Unit name and type (frontend / backend / infra / data / mobile / AI)
  • Repositories, services, infrastructure scopes, or pipelines included
  • Technical decision ownership (team, client, shared, unknown)
  • Assessment period
  • Authoritative systems for code, docs, CI/CD, incidents, observability, security

Workflow

  1. Run project-assessment-evidence to build evidence map
  2. Select indicator groups matching the unit type (see references/indicator-groups.md)
  3. Score only indicators with evidence; mark rest as Not assessed
  4. Note confidence and missing evidence per score
  5. Apply output-handshake before final scorecard

Scoring rules

Use the 1–5 scale from references/indicator-groups.md. Do not average unrelated indicators without explaining weighting. Request validator for subjective scores.

References

  • references/indicator-groups.md — all indicator groups + scoring scale + AI-native readiness
  • references/default-template.md — technical unit scorecard template
  • references/example-frontend-assessment.md — example assessment for a frontend team

Delegates to

Need Skill
Evidence intake project-assessment-evidence
Multi-unit routing project-assessment
Deep UI/UX review figma / figma-implement-design
Repo discovery assistant
Final output gate output-handshake
Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 676a0fb1c91a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

technical-unit-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit (19 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

verify

Fact-check claims encountered during reading — dates, names, events, citations. Use when encountering historical facts or disputed claims.

yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit · 26 tokens

skillnote

Self-hosted skill registry for OpenClaw. Stores procedures your team writes (name, description, body), syncs them to disk before each task, and collects which-helped/which-failed signals from the agent so the registry improves over time.

luna-prompts/skillnote · 54 tokens

pr-alignment-loop

Iterate a PR to its final form by running two opposing reviewer droids (reviewer-robustness and reviewer-minimalist) in a bounded back-and-forth loop. The main orchestrator synthesizes their feedback, makes edits, runs tests, and stops when both approve, on stagnation, or after 3 rounds. Use when the user asks to…

nikships/skills-registry · 122 tokens

publish-website

Publish a website to Porkbun Secure Static Hosting. Use when the user asks you to build, create, update or put live a website, landing page or placeholder page for a domain they have at Porkbun, mentions Porkbun hosting or static hosting, or asks how to upload site files to Porkbun.

oborseth/Porkbun-MCP · 65 tokens

create-rule

Use when creating, writing, or updating a Claude Code rule file (.claude/rules/.md or /.claude/rules/.md), or when asking about rule format, path scoping, or rule best practices.

paultyng/skill-issue · 48 tokens

platform-setup

Set up, verify, and troubleshoot Katalon True Platform/TestOps MCP connectivity for any AI coding agent. Use when you need to install or configure the Katalon MCP server, connect to a Katalon platform account, verify available Katalon MCP tools, diagnose missing authentication or repository access, confirm…

katalon-labs/true-skills · 110 tokens