Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit --skill verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00713 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00357 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/verify — Fact Verification Skill
Purpose
Fact-check claims encountered during reading sessions. This covers dates, names, historical events, publication details, and attribution of ideas. Use when the user questions a claim or when a factual assertion seems uncertain.
Trigger Words
This skill activates on: verify, check this, fact-check, is this correct, /verify.
Workflow
- Extract the claim from the user's input or from conversation context. Identify the specific factual assertion to verify (date, name, event, publication, attribution).
- Search authoritative sources using WebSearch. Prioritise:
- Wikipedia (for dates, biographical facts, historical events)
- Academic databases (Google Scholar, JSTOR, PhilPapers)
- Publisher websites (for publication dates, editions, ISBNs)
- Encyclopedias (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Britannica)
- Compare the original claim against verified information.
- Output the verdict using the format below.
- Optionally annotate the notes file. If the user confirms, use Edit to add a
(verified)or(corrected: {correct info})tag next to the relevant entry in the notes file.
Output Format
## Verification
**Claim**: {the original claim as stated in the source}
**Verdict**: Confirmed | Needs correction | Incorrect | Unverifiable
| Item | Original | Verified |
|------|----------|----------|
| {specific fact} | {as claimed} | {as verified} |
**Source**: {single-line citation in the project's declared style — see `literature/reading_notes/_template_NOTES.md` for per-style examples; the active style is `Citation style:` in `CLAUDE.md`. Append the URL after the citation if the source is web-only}
**Confidence**: High | Medium | Low
**Notes**: {any additional context, e.g., "Date varies by edition" or "Multiple conflicting sources"}
Multiple Claims
When verifying several claims at once, produce one verification block per claim, numbered sequentially:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 72 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 366cc9711f14
verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository yha9806/academic-writing-toolkit (36 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 713 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
academic-cv
Write academic CVs, cover letters, research statements, teaching philosophies, diversity statements, and prepare for academic job applications. Use this skill whenever you need to create or improve an academic CV, write a research statement, develop a teaching philosophy, prepare application materials for faculty…
conference-presentation
Design and write conference posters, oral presentations, slide decks, and conference abstracts. Use this skill whenever you need to create a research poster, prepare slides for an academic talk, design a conference presentation, write a conference abstract, or prepare for Q&A. Trigger for: "design my conference…
argumentation-engine
Build, analyse, strengthen, and evaluate academic arguments using formal argumentation frameworks. Use this skill whenever the user needs to construct a logical argument, write a critical analysis, respond to counterarguments, evaluate the strength of evidence, identify logical fallacies, or apply argumentation models…
figure-table-checker
Check, improve, and ensure compliance of figures and tables in academic papers. Use this skill whenever the user needs to verify figure or table formatting, choose error bar types, check colorblind accessibility, ensure APA or journal-specific compliance, create CONSORT or PRISMA flow diagrams, or fix common figure…
latex-writer
Write, structure, and compile LaTeX documents for academic purposes. Use this skill whenever the user needs to write a LaTeX document, choose the right document class or packages, format equations, manage bibliographies, create figures and tables in LaTeX, troubleshoot errors, or prepare a journal-ready manuscript.…
literature-review
Plan, structure, write, and improve academic literature reviews of all types — including narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and literature review chapters in dissertations. Use this skill whenever the user needs to write a literature review, synthesise multiple sources, structure a review chapter, understand…