Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/unifapi-agent/agents/ai-answer-gapnpx skills add unifapi-agent/agents --skill ai-answer-gapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unifapi-agent/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/unifapi-agent/agents/ai-answer-gap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/unifapi-agent/agents/ai-answer-gap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/unifapi-agent/agents/ai-answer-gap.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00124 | $0.02355 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.01177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
ai-answer-gap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI Answer Gap
Find the prompts where the brand should be cited in AI answers but isn't, name who owns each answer instead, and rank the gaps by AI search volume — so the content team attacks the biggest, most winnable misses first. This is the bridge from "we're not visible in AI" to a concrete, sequenced content backlog.
This is an enhanced skill: it reads live public data through UnifAPI. A "gap" is never a hunch — it is a real uncited AI answer with a named owner, weighted by real AI-search demand.
Use UnifAPI for live evidence
This is an enhanced skill: it reads live public data through UnifAPI — a "gap" is never a hunch but a real uncited AI answer with a named owner, weighted by real AI-search demand. Use the unifapi skill to connect (OAuth MCP), then discover these GEO operations. All are POST; hold engine (google / chatgpt), location, and language constant across the run.
- Find the gap —
geo/serp(query= candidate prompt,target= brand domain,view: "full"). A gap exists only when an answer renders, the brand is not a cited reference (is_targetfalse), and the answer cites someone else. Capture the cited domains as the owner. - Confirm absence at scale —
geo/mentions/search(target= brand + competitors array) confirms the brand is genuinely absent across the LLM-mentions index, not just uncited on one pull. - Rank gaps by demand — the primary sort key —
geo/keywords/search-volumereturns generative-AI demand per prompt. This drives the ranking; pull it for the whole candidate set first and drop near-zero prompts before spending on SERP calls. - Who owns each answer —
geo/mentions/top-pagesandgeo/mentions/top-domainsrank the exact pages and domains winning citations for the set, so the backlog says what content to beat, not just that a gap exists. - Which competitor owns the most —
geo/mentions/cross-aggregated-metricscompares share across labeled groups (brand vs each named competitor), so you know whether one rival dominates the gaps (attack it directly) or they're spread across many third parties (a presence problem). - Quick-win cross-read —
seo/serp(target= brand). Where the brand already ranks organically but isn't cited, the fix is extractability, not new content — tag thesequick.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 93 lines · 124 tokens per session scan A 86c3a386dd29
ai-answer-gap is a skill published in the GitHub repository unifapi-agent/agents (559 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 124 tokens to every session and 2,355 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
orangeo-ai-visibility-skill
Audit brand AI visibility readiness and prepare OranGEO-style GEO, AEO, LLM SEO, and AI search optimization action plans. Use when asked for a Claude Code skill, Codex skill, GEO skill, generative engine optimization skill, answer engine optimization skill, AI visibility audit, AI search visibility checker, llms.txt…
ai-visibility
Measure and improve whether AI assistants (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot) recommend a brand, and fix the reasons they do not. Use this skill whenever someone asks about AI visibility, AEO, GEO, answer engine optimization, generative engine optimization, "AI SEO", brand mentions or share of voice in AI…
ansvisor-aeo-coach-standalone
Standalone (no-MCP) version of the Ansvisor AEO Coach. Use this only when the user's Claude client cannot connect to the Ansvisor MCP server (e.g. claude.ai web without a Connector configured). Fetches live data from the Ansvisor REST API directly with the user's API key via code execution. For clients that support…
ansvisor-aeo-coach
Acts as an Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) analyst for users running Ansvisor. Activates when the user asks how their brand is doing across AI search engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, AI Overview, AI Mode), why visibility changed, or how they compare to competitors. Uses the Ansvisor MCP server…
open-geo
Run an end-to-end GEO visibility measurement through a real AI interface, persist the captures, and return a portable JSON run artifact plus optional PDF/dashboard outputs. Use automatically on an explicit request to measure a brand's AI-search visibility, and as a composable data-collection step inside another agent…
geo-platform-optimizer
Platform-specific AI search optimization — audit and optimize for Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Bing Copilot individually.