Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplatenpx agentmods add skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate/regression-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 51 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Excessive Agency · line 273 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00174 | $0.15237 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00070 | $0.06095 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.03047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01524 |
Grade A, and why
regression-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 682 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forbidden invocations
NEVER invoke /sdd-* skills from this workflow. SDD is an optional
user-installed ceremony; this skill ships self-contained and does not chain
SDD under any condition. If you need to refactor KATA, fixtures, cli/,
scripts/, or api/schemas/ pipeline, exit this skill first and invoke
/framework-development — which itself runs Plan → Code → Verify → Archive
natively (no SDD required).
This boundary is mechanical, not advisory: scripts/lint-skills.ts rejects
any /sdd- mention outside this section. See:
.agents/skills/agentic-qa-core/references/skill-composition-strategy.md §4
(governs users who manually install SDD).
Regression Testing — Execute, Analyze, Decide
Orchestrates the full release-readiness pipeline: trigger a CI suite, monitor it to completion, classify failures, score against release criteria, and emit a GO / CAUTION / NO-GO verdict plus a stakeholder report.
Three phases, always in this order: Execute → Analyze → Report. Do not skip analysis and jump to a report. Do not guess classification without reading failure logs.
Compact Rules
- DO: run Execute → Analyze → Report in that order. Never skip analysis and jump to a report, and never classify a failure without reading its logs.
- DO: clear the readiness preflight before triggering anything —
ghauthenticated, the suite's workflow file present, GitHub Actions secrets set, Allure resolvable, active env confirmed. A long run that 401s mid-way is the expensive failure. - DO: persist
RUN_IDthe moment the trigger returns, before anything else. Resume re-attaches to a live run instead of re-triggering CI; a trigger that landed without the id saved costs the whole run again. - DO NOT: mark a failure REGRESSION without checking its history first — the single most common misclassification. A first-ever failure with no history is NEW TEST, unverified, not a regression.
- DO: classify every failure into exactly one of KNOWN-BLOCKED / KNOWN ISSUE / ENVIRONMENT / NEW TEST / FLAKY / REGRESSION, and assess severity on a separate axis — a FLAKY test on checkout is still CRITICAL. Classification is fail-closed: every class but REGRESSION cites its evidence (the
@blocked:{BUG-KEY}marker; a ticket created BEFORE the run; the matching log line plus the other failures on that host; the empty history query; the ids and results of at least 5 runs on an unchanged build). No citation, or a ticket this session filed, = REGRESSION. - DO: exclude
@blocked:{BUG-KEY}tests from the gating pass-rate and report their count with each blocking key. They are parked behind an already-filed bug: never REGRESSION, and never a new bug. - DO NOT: use ENVIRONMENT as a scapegoat. Many unrelated tests failing on one host is environment; one test failing on an endpoint other tests reach fine is more likely a REGRESSION.
- DO NOT: call a test flaky on fewer than 5 runs of history — mark "insufficient history" and re-evaluate rather than guessing.
- DO NOT: emit GO while any REGRESSION-class failure stands. Hard vetoes regardless of score: any
@criticaltest failing, any HIGH/CRITICAL-severity regression, or a pass rate below 90%. - DO: file only CONFIRMED product failures — the REGRESSION class, plus a NEW TEST failure once manually confirmed to be a real defect. FLAKY, ENVIRONMENT and KNOWN ISSUE get no issue at all. Triage decides WHETHER to file; the defect-management doctrine decides the type and the fields.
- DO NOT: open a GitHub issue for a quality failure. It is filed in the issue tracker, parented to the QA Defect Management process epic and linked to the source Story — never to a product or dev epic.
- DO: create the RTR (Regression Test Results, a Test Execution:
RTR: {scope-id}: Regression Testing, parent QA Test Artifacts, Test Environment set, assignee self,testPlan→ RTP) BEFORE triggering CI, persist its key besideRUN_ID, and pass it as theexecution_keydispatch input. One RTR per verdict. The STR is created or completed ONLY when the run is the sprint close (then it links to both the STP and the RTP). - DO NOT: import a regular regression run into the sprint STR, and never let smoke or sanity write into a regression execution: they import only when an execution key is passed explicitly.
- DO: close the RTR (or the sprint-close STR) via
completeonly AFTER the verdict comment is posted on it, and leave the RTP at its ready status: a suite run never completes the plan it ran from. - DO NOT: invent a sprint number. The RTR needs none (its scope-id is
{env}-{YYYY-MM-DD}or a release tag).Nmatters only for the sprint-close STR: take it from the user or from the STP's own scope-id, and ask before creating anything at sprint altitude. - DO NOT: skip the artifact download on a red build (evidence vanishes after the retention window), and never merge smoke and regression results into one pass-rate — their SLOs differ.
- DO: inspect traces and screenshots with
/playwright-cli([AUTOMATION_TOOL]); it is the only browser path, no MCP backs it.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed bbc2d7093282
- 16d ago Changed 24c9f95a3419
- 17d ago Changed 35cfcb70c023
- 18d ago Changed a9942a71655c
- 20d ago Changed · +2 lines 34bb34708a86
- 22d ago Changed · -1 lines 3a993c1f6dbc
- 27d ago Changed · +2 lines 3e5ba228d4a6
- 28d ago Changed · +2 lines 1c21dba1dbd0
- 29d ago Changed · +59 lines f39b2db3660b
- 1mo ago First seen · 618 lines · 174 tokens per session scan A 5aa9d59a26dc
regression-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate (26 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 174 tokens to every session and 15,237 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-testing-harness
Use this skill when testing AI agent systems. Activate when the user needs to test agent behavior, write tests for multi-agent systems, implement agent evaluation frameworks, create test harnesses for autonomous agents, or validate agent outputs systematically.
test-generation-patterns
Use this skill when generating tests with AI assistance. Activate when the user wants to create unit tests, integration tests, generate test cases, improve test coverage, write tests for existing code, or set up testing patterns for their project.
api-test-patterns
Write comprehensive API tests for REST and GraphQL endpoints. Use this skill when testing APIs, writing contract tests, or validating integrations. Activate when: api testing, REST test, GraphQL test, endpoint testing, integration test, postman, contract testing.
playwright-patterns
Write reliable, maintainable E2E tests with Playwright best practices. Use this skill when writing Playwright tests, debugging flaky tests, or setting up E2E automation. Activate when: playwright, e2e test, end-to-end, browser testing, UI automation, web testing.
test-case-design
Design comprehensive test cases with proper coverage and clear documentation. Use this skill when writing test cases, creating test suites, or improving test coverage. Activate when: test case, test scenario, test coverage, test design, write tests, BDD, gherkin.
regression-evals
Set up continuous regression evals so model/prompt/tool changes don't silently break existing behavior. Covers gating thresholds, CI integration, statistical significance, and response to regressions. Use this skill when deploying prompts to production, gating model upgrades, or noticing "it worked yesterday" in AI…