Recon Skills is a pack of security-testing skills covering reconnaissance, web applications, APIs, authentication, vulnerability validation, cloud infrastructure, and reporting. Security professionals use it for authorized assessments of systems they own or have written permission to test. The catalogue entries are individual skills from the pack.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add uphiago/recon-skills --skill wordpress-full-compromisegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uphiago/recon-skills/wordpress-full-compromise)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uphiago/recon-skills/wordpress-full-compromise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uphiago/recon-skills/wordpress-full-compromise/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uphiago/recon-skills/wordpress-full-compromise"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uphiago/recon-skills/wordpress-full-compromise.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00944 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00189 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
wordpress-full-compromise scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
compatibility: Requires curl, a browser, approved test identities, and WordPress component evidence How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 135 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WordPress Compromise Path Analysis
Use this skill to determine whether verified WordPress primitives actually compose into administrative control or benign code-execution proof. It is a chain gate, not a checklist for forcing escalation after a prerequisite fails.
When to Use
- A plugin vulnerability has exact version and route evidence.
- An approved identity may have an unexpected WordPress capability.
- An upload or configuration write could reach executable handling.
- CORS, XML-RPC, staging, or source exposure may supply a missing prerequisite.
Prerequisites
- Explicit authorization for registration, authentication, upload, write, and execution testing.
- An approved synthetic account and disposable content.
- Exact WordPress, plugin, theme, and hosting behavior.
- A benign marker for any execution test.
- Cleanup and stop conditions.
How to Run
Build a prerequisite table:
Step State Required evidence
Component vulnerability observed exact version and affected operation
Authorized identity confirmed approved account and current role
Write or upload capability unverified synthetic artifact accepted
Executable handling unverified benign marker executed
Administrative control not tested approved admin-only action
Cleanup planned artifact and account removal
Do not proceed past an unverified prerequisite.
Procedure
1. Confirm the Component
Use hunt-wordpress and wordpress-plugin-hunt to establish:
- component identity from more than one signal;
- exact version or commit;
- vulnerable route or handler;
- authentication and role prerequisite;
- affected configuration and file type.
A public readme or stale asset is not sufficient by itself.
2. Confirm Identity and Capability
Use only approved test identities. Record the current role and the exact capability checked by the operation. Subscriber, customer, author, editor, and administrator roles are not interchangeable.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 135 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A f38fa43c3b24
wordpress-full-compromise is a skill published in the GitHub repository uphiago/recon-skills (1,247 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 944 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
performing-cloud-asset-inventory-with-cartography
Perform comprehensive cloud asset inventory and relationship mapping using Cartography to build a Neo4j security graph of infrastructure assets, IAM permissions, and attack paths across AWS, GCP, and Azure.
detecting-compromised-cloud-credentials
Detecting compromised cloud credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP by analyzing anomalous API activity, impossible travel patterns, unauthorized resource provisioning, and credential abuse indicators using GuardDuty, Defender for Identity, and SCC Event Threat Detection.
implementing-cloud-dlp-for-data-protection
Implementing Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) using Amazon Macie, Azure Information Protection, and Google Cloud DLP API to discover, classify, and protect sensitive data across cloud storage, databases, and data pipelines.
securing-api-gateway-with-aws-waf
Securing API Gateway endpoints with AWS WAF by configuring managed rule groups for OWASP Top 10 protection, creating custom rate limiting rules, implementing bot control, setting up IP reputation filtering, and monitoring WAF metrics for security effectiveness.
auditing-aws-s3-bucket-permissions
Systematically audit AWS S3 bucket permissions to identify publicly accessible buckets, overly permissive ACLs, misconfigured bucket policies, and missing encryption settings using AWS CLI, S3audit, and Prowler to enforce least-privilege data access controls.
auditing-azure-active-directory-configuration
Auditing Microsoft Entra ID (Azure Active Directory) configuration to identify risky authentication policies, overly permissive role assignments, stale accounts, conditional access gaps, and guest user risks using AzureAD PowerShell, Microsoft Graph API, and ScoutSuite.