Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/upstash/context7/context7-mcpnpx skills add upstash/context7 --skill context7-mcpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/upstash/context7Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/upstash/context7/context7-mcp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/upstash/context7/context7-mcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/upstash/context7/context7-mcp.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00058 | $0.00575 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
context7-mcp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- context7-mcp — 88% identical, 6 lines differ
- context7-mcp — 88% identical, 6 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When the user asks about libraries, frameworks, or needs code examples, use Context7 to fetch current documentation instead of relying on training data.
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when the user:
- Asks setup or configuration questions ("How do I configure Next.js middleware?")
- Requests code involving libraries ("Write a Prisma query for...")
- Needs API references ("What are the Supabase auth methods?")
- Mentions specific frameworks (React, Vue, Svelte, Express, Tailwind, etc.)
How to Fetch Documentation
Step 1: Resolve the Library ID
Call resolve-library-id with:
libraryName: The library name extracted from the user's questionquery: What to look up in the library's documentation (improves relevance ranking)
Step 2: Select the Best Match
From the resolution results, choose based on:
- Exact or closest name match to what the user asked for
- Higher benchmark scores indicate better documentation quality
- If the user mentioned a version (e.g., "React 19"), prefer version-specific IDs
Step 3: Fetch the Documentation
Call query-docs with:
libraryId: The selected Context7 library ID (e.g.,/vercel/next.js)query: What to look up in the library's documentation, scoped to a single concept
If the user's question spans multiple distinct concepts (e.g. routing and auth and caching), make a separate query-docs call per concept with the same library ID, unless the question is about how the concepts interact — combined queries dilute ranking and return shallow results for each topic.
Step 4: Use the Documentation
Incorporate the fetched documentation into your response:
- Answer the user's question using current, accurate information
- Include relevant code examples from the docs
- Cite the library version when relevant
Guidelines
- Be specific: Describe what to look up in the library's documentation, but keep each query to a single concept
- One topic per query: Split multi-topic questions into separate
query-docscalls — resolve the library ID once, then query per concept, unless the question is about how the concepts interact - Version awareness: When users mention versions ("Next.js 15", "React 19"), use version-specific library IDs if available from the resolution step
- Prefer official sources: When multiple matches exist, prefer official/primary packages over community forks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 57 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 29ef59d34287
context7-mcp is a skill published in the GitHub repository upstash/context7 (61,493 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 575 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
investigate-issue
Investigate a GitHub issue by fetching details, analyzing the codebase, researching documentation, and presenting an actionable implementation plan with test guidance. Use when asked to investigate, analyze, triage, or plan work for a GitHub issue. Invoked with /investigate-issue or /investigate-issue (prompts for ID).
resolve-pr-comments-stack
Resolve unresolved PR review comments across an entire Graphite (gt) stack of many PRs, bottom-up, in one working directory. Use when asked to "go through this stack and resolve comments", "clean up review comments across the whole stack", or given a list/range of PR numbers that form (or partially form) a gt stack.…
harness-test-writer
Add regression test cases to the Bifrost provider harness (the Postman collection run via make run-provider-harness-test) based on a merged PR or a GitHub issue. Fetches the PR/issue, traces the affected wire path in the codebase, checks existing harness coverage, designs cases following harness conventions, inserts…
review-pr
Reviews a PR or diff with multi-angle finders and adversarial verification, then reports a findings table, a merge/no-merge recommendation, required followups, and offers to create a follow-up PR. Use when the user types /review-pr [PR# | branch | path].
gentech-blockrun
GenTech Labs' integration patterns for BlockRun MCP from Hermes Agent. Covers daily usage patterns, cost-optimized workflows, multi-tool pipelines, and reliable error handling for BlockRun's full toolset.
portainer-mcp-hygiene
How to drive the Portainer MCP server's tools correctly — both reading and mutating. Reading: project responses with select (JMESPath), where the heavy fields live (snapshots, status blocks, managed fields), how to handle non-JSON Docker/K8s proxy endpoints (container and pod logs, stats, exec), and how to interpret…