Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/useagenthq/useagent/task-conventionnpx skills add useagenthq/useagent --skill task-conventiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/useagenthq/useagentWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00582 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00291 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
Task Convention scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 49 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A ae668937f22d
Task Convention is a skill published in the GitHub repository useagenthq/useagent (125 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 582 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autogpt-agents
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.
strands-review
Local preview of the strands-agents/devtools /strands review agent. Body is the upstream Task Reviewer SOP verbatim — do not paraphrase. Use when the user types /strands-review, asks for a "strands review" of a PR, or wants to anticipate what the remote /strands review GitHub Action will flag. Findings are close but…
docs-writer
Draft or rewrite Strands Agents documentation pages. Use when writing new doc pages, rewriting pages that failed audit, drafting sections for existing pages, or writing blog posts and release notes about Strands. Also triggers on "write a doc", "draft a page", "rewrite the quickstart", "add a tutorial for X"…
pr-writer
Generates pull request titles and descriptions. Use when the user asks to create, open, write, draft, or generate a PR, pull request, or merge request description.
docs-audit
Assess a published or in-progress documentation page for quality, accuracy, and voice compliance. Use before rewriting a page, during periodic health checks, when community signals point to confusion, or when comparing against competitor docs. Also triggers on "audit this page", "assess the docs", "what's wrong with…
pre-push
Runs the local equivalent of the CI merge gate before you push. Detects which areas (Python, TypeScript, docs) your changes touch, auto-fixes what it can, then runs only those checks. Use when the user asks to run pre-push checks, get push-ready, verify changes before pushing or opening a PR, "make sure CI will pass"…