Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Uxcel-Lab/product-skills --skill accessibilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Uxcel-Lab/product-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/uxcel-lab/product-skills/accessibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uxcel-lab/product-skills/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uxcel-lab/product-skills/accessibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/uxcel-lab/product-skills/accessibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/uxcel-lab/product-skills/accessibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.03321 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01328 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00664 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00332 |
Grade A, and why
ux-accessibility-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Audit Skill
How this skill behaves (read first)
This is an evaluative skill — it reviews existing work against a standard (WCAG), it doesn't generate UI. Flagging is safe, so it auto-runs and is designed to be called as a validation step by generative skills as well as invoked directly.
It owns the accessibility concern in this repo. Generative skills hand off to it (e.g. ux-login-signup, ux-pricing), and the heuristics audit (ux-heuristics-audit) deliberately defers contrast / keyboard / screen-reader specifics here rather than duplicating them. When invoked, do the full a11y pass; don't assume another skill covered it.
Scope discipline. When invoked directly (the user named this audit), review only this concern — don't pull in sibling audits. It runs alongside other lenses only when an orchestrator (ux-design-review) or a generative skill calls it under docs/orchestration-policy.md, where it sits in Tier B — offered (and narrowed to usage when a design system is in play). Explicit scope always wins.
What this skill changes vs. default behavior
By default, accessibility feedback tends to be partial and vague — a few obvious call-outs ("add alt text", "check contrast") with no standard, no severity, and no systematic sweep. This skill forces four things:
- Every finding cites the WCAG criterion and level it violates — not a vague suggestion.
- Every finding gets a severity based on how completely it blocks access — so the list is prioritized.
- Every finding has a concrete fix — the specific markup/design change.
- The audit is systematic — it sweeps all six categories below, so issues outside the obvious ones (focus order, heading hierarchy, table semantics, motion) actually get caught.
WCAG foundations
POUR principles — every audit item maps to one of these four:
- Perceivable — content must be detectable via at least one sense (sight, hearing, etc.)
- Operable — all interactions must work without a mouse (keyboard, switch, voice)
- Understandable — content and UI must be clear and predictable
- Robust — content must work across browsers, devices, and assistive technologies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 263 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 885f9a2cbacc
ux-accessibility-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Uxcel-Lab/product-skills (40 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 3,321 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
ux-accessibility-audit compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ux-accessibility-auditUxcel-Lab/product-skills | Skill | 40 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code |
| pm-brand-motionkonglong87/superPM | Skill | 86 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 77 | Claude Code |
| pm-protokonglong87/superPM | Skill | 86 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 55 | Claude Code |
| visual-brand-kitgenfeedai/skills | Skill | 3 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| build-for-good-uxalper-dev/build-for-good-ux-skill | Skill | 17 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 87 | Claude Code, Codex |
| diagram-designaiskillstore/marketplace | Skill | 452 | yesterday | none | A | 188 | Claude Code, Codex |
| piaochuang-chuanghu-zhuangxiu-zhinanaiskillstore/marketplace | Skill | 452 | yesterday | none | A | 94 | Claude Code, Codex |