Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vadim-filimonov/openrater --skill transcribe-filinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vadim-filimonov/openraterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vadim-filimonov/openrater/transcribe-filing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vadim-filimonov/openrater/transcribe-filing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vadim-filimonov/openrater/transcribe-filing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vadim-filimonov/openrater/transcribe-filing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vadim-filimonov/openrater/transcribe-filing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00102 | $0.03073 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00041 | $0.01229 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00615 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
transcribe-filing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Transcribe a filing into an executable rating plan
You are the transcriber. OpenRater is the calculator. You read documents and fill in a spec'd Excel workbook; the platform deterministically validates it (R-### rules), builds the plan, and rates risks. You never compute premiums yourself, never guess at factors, and never work around a refusal.
Non-negotiable rules
- Review stops. STOP and show the human (with the
open_in_openraterlink where relevant) at each of:- the completed workbook, BEFORE building — tell them to open it in Excel next to the filing;
- any
validate_workbookerrors — list them by R-### and sheet!cell; - the
gaps_and_assumptionsledger, after building; - any failed
test_casesvector — this means the transcription does NOT reproduce the filing; do not use the plan until resolved. Never continue past a stop without an explicit go-ahead.
- Bulk data stays out of the chat. Books and CSVs travel as file paths; report counts and summaries only.
- Record gaps; never approximate. If the filing uses a construct
the capability registry marks unsupported, write it into
gaps_and_assumptionsand keep going. A visible gap beats a wrong number nobody can see. - The user supplies the documents. Never fetch from SERFF or any filing portal yourself — no scraping, ever.
- Filed rates govern. Present results as reconstructions verified against the filing's own worked examples — not as the carrier's official rates.
First run — the three doors (offer once, then never again)
On the user's FIRST substantive OpenRater message of a conversation — when nothing in the conversation shows they've used it before — orient with ONE short menu, then follow their pick. Never re-show the menu in the same conversation; a user who arrives with a filing or a clear ask walks straight through the matching door without seeing a menu at all. (Same behavior in Claude Desktop and Claude Code.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 102 tokens per session scan A 24d9d402a4f5
transcribe-filing is a skill published in the GitHub repository vadim-filimonov/openrater (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 102 tokens to every session and 3,073 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
officecli-financial-model
Use this skill when the user wants to build a financial model — 3-statement model, DCF valuation, LBO, SaaS unit economics, sensitivity / scenario analysis, debt schedule, or fundraising projections — in Excel. Trigger on: 'financial model', '3-statement model', 'P&L + BS + CF', 'DCF', 'WACC', 'NPV', 'terminal value'…
dcf-model
Build discounted cash flow valuation workbooks in Excel.
comps-analysis
Build comparable-company valuation workbooks in Excel.
lbo-model
Build leveraged buyout workbooks with IRR/MOIC in Excel.
excel-author
Build auditable financial workbooks headless via openpyxl.
3-statement-model
Build integrated IS/BS/CF financial workbooks in Excel.