Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ValorVie/custom-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistantWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/valorvie/custom-skills/test-coverage-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00067 | $0.02090 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01045 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 294 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage Assistant
Language: English | 繁體中文
Version: 1.1.1 Last Updated: 2026-01-30 Applicability: Claude Code Skills
Purpose
This skill helps evaluate and improve test completeness using the 8 dimensions framework, ensuring comprehensive test coverage for each feature.
Quick Reference
The 8 Dimensions
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Test Completeness = 8 Dimensions │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Happy Path Normal expected behavior │
│ 2. Boundary Min/max values, limits │
│ 3. Error Handling Invalid input, exceptions │
│ 4. Authorization Role-based access control │
│ 5. State Changes Before/after verification │
│ 6. Validation Format, business rules │
│ 7. Integration Real query verification │
│ 8. AI Generation AI-generated test quality (NEW) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Dimension Summary Table
| # | Dimension | What to Test | Key Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Happy Path | Valid input → expected output | Does the normal flow work? |
| 2 | Boundary | Min/max values, limits | What happens at edges? |
| 3 | Error Handling | Invalid input, not found | How do errors behave? |
| 4 | Authorization | Role permissions | Who can do what? |
| 5 | State Changes | Before/after states | Did the state change correctly? |
| 6 | Validation | Format, business rules | Is input validated? |
| 7 | Integration | Real DB/API calls | Does the query really work? |
| 8 | AI Generation | AI-generated test quality | Are AI tests meaningful? |
When to Apply Each Dimension
| Feature Type | Required Dimensions |
|---|---|
| CRUD API | 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8* |
| Query/Search | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8* |
| State Machine | 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8* |
| Validation Logic | 1, 2, 3, 6, 8* |
| Background Job | 1, 3, 5, 8* |
| External Integration | 1, 3, 7, 8* |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 294 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 9b153c519fa6
test-coverage-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository ValorVie/custom-skills (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 2,090 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-tester
Test HTTP APIs, validate responses, generate test suites, and diagnose API issues.
dx-optimizer
Use when optimizing the complete developer workflow including build times, feedback loops, testing efficiency, and developer satisfaction metrics across the entire development environment.
voiden
Create and edit Voiden .void files for API testing. Covers the .void file format and all enabled extension block types.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
team-qa
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.
playtest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.