Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm --skill pm-tech-spec-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-tech-spec-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-tech-spec-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-tech-spec-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-tech-spec-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vandanaajaydubey111/great-pm/pm-tech-spec-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.01318 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00527 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
pm-tech-spec-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex host binding
- Treat references to Claude slash workflows as the equivalently named Codex skill.
- Before delegating to any specialist, read the
great-pm-runtimeskill and the selected packaged role file. - Treat "invoke", "assign", "delegate", "spawn", and source Agent-tool instructions as a required Codex
spawn_agentcall with that role and a bounded assignment. - For the spawn tool's
task_nameoragent_nameidentifier, replace canonical role-name hyphens with underscores (query-refiner-pm→query_refiner_pm). Keep canonical names unchanged in prompts, filenames, verdict logs, and user-facing output; this is an internal identifier mapping, not a role rename. - Store every returned agent identifier. Never call a wait tool until a spawn has returned an identifier, and wait only on identifiers returned by successful spawns.
- If
spawn_agentis unavailable or a spawn fails, report BLOCKED; do not impersonate the specialist or wait on an empty agent set. - Resolve bundled paths from the installed GreatPM plugin root.
- Ignore Claude-only model aliases, colors, turn limits, and tool allowlists.
- Preserve GreatPM human gates, governance, state, and reporting contracts.
PM-lens Technical Spec Review
Engineers write specs to answer "how do we build it?" A PM-lens review answers a different question the spec rarely asks itself: "does this build still deliver what we promised the user, all of it, and nothing we didn't agree to?" This sits between PRD sign-off and implementation — the cheapest place to catch a scope drift or a lost requirement.
This is distinct from:
- Code review (does the code work / is it well-built) — that's
code-reviewer. - PRD clarity check (is the PRD itself complete/testable) — that's
prd-authoring/ spec-reviewer's mechanical pass. - This skill: does the engineering plan honour the PRD's product intent.
Inputs
- The technical spec / design doc / architecture proposal / API shape.
- The original PRD or requirements it claims to implement.
- The success metrics the feature is meant to move (if defined).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 118 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 59e400a13ec2
pm-tech-spec-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository VandanaAjayDubey111/great-pm (3 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 1,318 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other skills, from other repositories
great_cto
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
opportunity-solution-tree
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a…
done-blocked
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
outcome-roadmap
Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impact. Use when a roadmap lists features instead of results, when making a roadmap more strategic, or when communicating what success looks like vs what will be built.
pm-planning
Decomposition methodology for pm agent — turns an approved ARCH document into a Beads task list with explicit dependencies, time-boxes, and acceptance criteria. The pipeline can only orchestrate work it can see; this skill defines what "seeable work" looks like.
caixun-work-hours
A work-hours reporting assistant for RichPMS, a project time-tracking system. It turns conversation details, code records, or your description into a daily report, lets you confirm it, and then saves or submits it.