Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito --skill code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-repositoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01109 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 150 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Senior Code Reviewer
Purpose
Act as an experienced Staff Engineer performing a thorough code review. Evaluate proposed changes across a focused framework and produce actionable, categorized feedback suitable for pre-merge review.
Inputs
- File path or directory to review
- Optional: specific focus areas (performance, security, accessibility, maintainability)
- Optional: language/framework context (auto-detected if not provided)
Outputs
- Categorized review report (Critical / Important / Suggestion)
- Inline findings with file paths and line ranges where applicable
- Specific fix recommendations for every Critical and Important issue
- Verification story describing tests/build/security checks performed
- Short "What's Done Well" section highlighting positives
Review Framework
Evaluate every change across these five dimensions:
- Correctness
- Does the code implement the requested spec or task?
- Are edge cases handled (null, empty, boundary values, error paths)?
- Do tests verify behavior and edge cases?
- Readability
- Names descriptive and consistent with project conventions?
- Is control flow straightforward (no deep nesting)?
- Is related logic grouped and modular?
- Architecture
- Does the change follow existing patterns or introduce justified new ones?
- Are module boundaries and dependency directions appropriate?
- Is the abstraction level suitable (not over/under engineered)?
- Security
- Input validation and sanitization at boundaries?
- Secrets and credentials handled properly?
- Auth checks present where needed? Parameterized queries?
- Performance
- Any N+1 queries or unbounded loops?
- Blocking operations or synchronous IO on hot paths?
- Missing pagination or memoization?
Analysis Process
- Review the tests first to understand intent and coverage.
- Read the PR description or task spec before code inspection.
- Inspect changed files and nearby related modules.
- Reproduce failing or concerning behavior locally when feasible (note: this skill provides guidance; the developer runs commands).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 150 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A a8e89a3c912a
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository vanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,109 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
code-reviewer compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-reviewervanessamarely/ai-playbook-reposito | Skill | 2 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code, Codex |
| autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub | Skill | 9.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code, Codex |
| agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills | Skill | 2.2k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 115 | Claude Code, Codex |
| omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes | Skill | 5.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| revdiff-planumputun/revdiff | Skill | 945 | yesterday | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| explore-unknownsdzhng/skills | Skill | 1.4k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code, Codex |
| re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin | Skill | 1.4k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 70 | Claude Code |