Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Varnan-Tech/opendirectory --skill competitor-pr-findergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Varnan-Tech/opendirectoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/varnan-tech/opendirectory/competitor-pr-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varnan-tech/opendirectory/competitor-pr-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varnan-tech/opendirectory/competitor-pr-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varnan-tech/opendirectory/competitor-pr-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varnan-tech/opendirectory/competitor-pr-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 9 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 52 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
- high Supply Chain · line 93 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
- high Supply Chain · line 109 Remote code is downloaded and executed. This bypasses code review and could introduce malicious code.Fix: Avoid downloading and executing remote scripts. Use trusted packages from PyPI/npm. If remote fetch is required, verify checksums and use HTTPS.
- high Tool Misuse · line 762 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 93 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 93 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 109 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 109 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 441 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.07470 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.03735 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.01494 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00747 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-pr-finder scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
from urllib.parse import urlparse How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 768 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitor PR Finder
Give it your product URL. It finds your competitors, researches every PR channel they used (news, podcasts, communities), surfaces the channels that appear across multiple competitors (your proven targets), finds the journalist or host for each, and drafts a personalized cold pitch for your product at every tier-1 channel.
Zero-hallucination policy: Every channel, journalist name, story angle, and pitch detail in the output must trace to a specific Tavily search result or the fetched product page. This applies to:
- Competitor names: must appear in Tavily search results, not AI training knowledge
- Channel names: must have a URL in the search results
- Journalist/host names: must appear verbatim in a Tavily snippet
- Story angles: extracted from article/episode titles in search results only
- Pitch drafts: reference specific evidence from search data + product analysis
Common Mistakes
| The agent will want to... | Why that's wrong |
|---|---|
| Name a journalist from training knowledge | Every journalist name must trace to a search result snippet. Writing "Sarah Perez covers startups at TechCrunch" from memory is hallucination. |
| List channels without evidence URLs | Every channel in the output must have at least one URL from the PR search results proving a competitor was featured there. |
| Skip the competitor confirmation step | Always show discovered competitors and wait for the user to confirm. Wrong competitors = wasted searches and a useless output. |
| Generate generic pitches ("We'd love to be featured") | Every pitch must reference a specific angle from the evidence AND a specific differentiator from the product analysis. |
| Mark a channel as Tier 1 with only 1 competitor occurrence | Tier 1 = 3+ competitors. Tier 2 = exactly 2. Tier 3 = 1. Do not promote channels that haven't proven themselves. |
| Use em dashes in output | Replace all em dashes (--) with hyphens. |
Read Reference Files Before Each Run
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 768 lines · 112 tokens per session scan A 202508fb6519
competitor-pr-finder is a skill published in the GitHub repository Varnan-Tech/opendirectory (635 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 7,470 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
content-style
Writing Reddit-native content that sounds human, avoids AI tells, and delivers value through structure and specificity. Applies to workshop posts, definitive model guides, research megathreads, and community FYI/update posts.
coding-worktree-recovery
Use this skill when coding-agent work is interrupted, an agent exits without a clean commit, multiple controllers target the same checkout, or the checkout produces inconsistent file/Git behavior.
macos-storage-management
Safely reclaim local Mac storage without mistaking cloud placeholders for resident data, losing File Provider content, or flattening metadata onto an incompatible external filesystem.
hermes-mnemosyne
Mnemosyne is Hermes' primary local-first memory engine — SQLite with vector + FTS5 hybrid search, 19+ tools, auto-consolidation, and a standalone CLI. It's a pip-installed plugin (not a built-in toolset) discovered via $HERMESHOME/plugins/mnemosyne/.
skill-auditor
Audit any Hermes skill file and assign a quality grade based on clarity, completeness, tool guidance, and shareability. Returns specific fix suggestions ranked by impact.
marketplace-purchase-vetting
Use this when the user asks whether a local listing is a scam, "too good to be true," worth looking at, or a good deal. Also use this when he asks you to find options — search/discover candidates, then vet the best ones. The goal is not a generic buying guide; it is a practical risk read with clear next steps.