Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks --skill requirement-extractiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks/requirement-extraction)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks/requirement-extraction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks/requirement-extraction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks/requirement-extraction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks/requirement-extraction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00910 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00455 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
requirement-extraction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requirement Extraction
What This Skill Enables
An agent that can take ambiguous human input - "make the dashboard faster," "add authentication," "fix the search" - and systematically convert it into concrete, testable requirements before writing code. Agents without this skill build the wrong thing confidently.
Core Competencies
1. Signal Capture
Receive input without interpreting or filtering:
- Record the exact words the user used
- Note what was said AND what was left unsaid
- Identify the stated goal vs the implied constraints
- Distinguish between the problem description and a proposed solution
2. Ambiguity Detection
Flag vague language that needs clarification:
| Vague Input | What's Missing | Clarifying Question |
|---|---|---|
| "Make it faster" | Faster by how much? Which operation? | "What's the current latency, and what's the target?" |
| "Add user roles" | Which roles? What permissions? | "What actions should each role be able to perform?" |
| "Fix the bug" | Which bug? How to reproduce? | "Can you describe the steps to trigger this behavior?" |
| "It should be secure" | Against what threats? What data? | "What sensitive data does this handle, and who should access it?" |
| "Like Spotify does it" | Which specific feature/behavior? | "Can you describe the specific interaction you're referring to?" |
3. Assumption Surfacing
Make every implicit assumption explicit before proceeding:
STATED: "Add a login page"
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
- Email + password authentication (not OAuth/SSO)
- Single user type (no admin vs regular distinction)
- Session-based auth (not token-based)
- Standard form with email and password fields
- Redirect to home page after successful login
- Show error message for invalid credentials
- No "remember me" or "forgot password" in v1
RISKS IF WRONG:
- OAuth requirement would change the entire auth architecture
- Multiple user types affect the data model and routing
→ Please confirm or correct these before I proceed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 98 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 3e8912cb1814
requirement-extraction is a skill published in the GitHub repository varunk130/ai-workflow-playbooks (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 910 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
customise-workflow
Customise the prd-taskmaster plugin workflow via curated brainstorm questions. The AI asks, the user answers in plain English, and the skill writes their preferences to .atlas-ai/config/atlas.json. Future runs of prd-taskmaster read that file and apply user preferences to phase gates, validation strictness, default…
expand-tasks
Expand all TaskMaster tasks with deep research before coding begins. Reads tasks.json, launches parallel research agents per task in waves using the research-expander agent. Writes findings back to tasks.json. Part of the prd-taskmaster toolkit. Use after PRD is parsed and before implementation. Invoke with…
epic-breakdown-advisor
Break down epics into user stories with Humanizing Work split patterns. Use when a backlog item is too large to estimate, sequence, or deliver safely.
prd-development
Build a structured PRD that connects problem, users, solution, and success criteria. Use when turning discovery notes into an engineering-ready document for a major initiative.
eol-process
Run a product sunset end to end — decide, align, plan, prepare, announce, close. Use when you need the whole EOL process, not just one artifact.
prioritization-advisor
Choose a prioritization framework based on stage, team context, and stakeholder needs. Use when deciding between RICE, ICE, value/effort, or another scoring approach.