Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public --skill ai-llmgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/ai-llm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/ai-llm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/ai-llm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/ai-llm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/ai-llm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 116 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 119 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.03980 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01990 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00796 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00398 |
Grade A, and why
ai-llm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Engineering - Lifecycle Skill
Modern Best Practices: treat the model as a versioned component with contracts, eval gates, rollout controls, cost budgets, and explicit fallback paths. Prefer stable decision criteria over static "best model" lists, and verify volatile provider facts against current official docs before recommending a stack.
This skill is the umbrella skill for deciding how to build, adapt, evaluate, migrate, and operate LLM systems.
Use this skill for architecture and lifecycle decisions. Use sibling skills for implementation depth.
No theory. No generic AI history. Focus on operational choices, tradeoffs, checklists, and reusable templates.
ASCII Flow
LLM product need
|
v
outcome contract
task + users + quality + latency + cost + privacy/compliance
|
v
architecture choice
prompt-only -> RAG -> tools/agents -> adaptation/fine-tuning -> hybrid
|
v
evaluation and rollout
golden set + edge cases + canary + observability + rollback
|
v
operated model component
versioned prompts/models/configs + fallbacks + governance
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when the user asks for:
- Choosing between prompt-only, RAG, tool use, fine-tuning, or hybrid LLM architectures
- Selecting a provider, model tier, or deployment path for a production workload
- Planning or reviewing model/provider migrations
- Designing eval suites, graders, rollout gates, and regression policies
- Calculating cost, latency, and quality tradeoffs at the system level
- Defining LLM governance: data handling, safety boundaries, compliance, and rollback
- Building current recommendations that depend on provider/platform capabilities
- Creating a preflight plan for an LLM project before implementation begins
Scope Boundaries (Use These Skills for Depth)
- Choosing the approach first (classical ML vs LLM vs RAG vs fine-tune vs agent) -> ai-architecture-advisor
- Eval methodology: LLM-judge bias, framework choice, threshold calibration, reproducibility -> ai-evals
- Prompt design, structured outputs, prompt CI/CD -> ai-prompt-engineering
- RAG design, chunking, retrieval, reranking -> ai-rag
- Agent architectures, MCP tools, multi-agent orchestration -> ai-agents
- Serving optimization, batching, routing, quantization -> ai-llm-inference
- Deployment, monitoring, incident response, security depth -> ai-mlops
- Hugging Face-specific LLM training workflows (TRL, SFT, DPO, GRPO) -> use the
huggingface-skills:plugin (external) - Build a transformer/GPT and BPE tokenizer from scratch (pre-training layer) -> ai-pretraining
- Multi-GPU pre-training: FSDP, DeepSpeed ZeRO, tensor/pipeline parallelism, reproduce GPT-2 -> ai-distributed-training
- Scaling laws, Chinchilla compute-optimal sizing, token/param budget -> ai-scaling-laws
- Web-scale + synthetic pre-training corpus curation and data ablations -> ai-data-curation-pretraining
- Post-training depth: RLHF/PPO, DPO, GRPO, RLVR, reward modeling, alignment, and reasoning-model training -> ai-post-training
What ships with it
41 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- _lib/resolve_versions.py 12 KB runs code
- agents/openai.yaml 291 B
- assets/agentic-workflows/template-multi-agent.md 3.5 KB
- assets/agentic-workflows/template-reflection.md 3.7 KB
- assets/data-pipelines/template-data-quality.md 3.2 KB
- assets/deployment/template-llm-deployment.md 3.7 KB
- assets/evaluation/template-multi-metric.md 3.6 KB
- assets/fine-tuning/template-config.md 864 B
- assets/fine-tuning/template-instruction.jsonl 459 B
- assets/fine-tuning/template-sft-dataset.jsonl 304 B
- assets/prompt-engineering/template-cot.md 3.7 KB
- assets/prompt-engineering/template-react.md 3.5 KB
- assets/rag-pipelines/template-advanced-rag.md 4.0 KB
- assets/rag-pipelines/template-basic-rag.md 4.0 KB
- assets/selection/fine-tuning-roi-calculator.md 7.7 KB
- assets/selection/model-selection-matrix.md 4.8 KB
- data/model-pricing.json 6.7 KB
- data/sources.json 33 KB
- learnings.consolidated.md 582 B
- learnings.md 376 B
- references/advanced-llm-patterns.md 36 KB
- references/agentic-patterns.md 6.7 KB
- references/anti-patterns.md 19 KB
- references/common-design-patterns.md 12 KB
- references/cost-economics.md 17 KB
- references/dataset-formatting-guide.md 5.6 KB
- references/decision-matrices.md 22 KB
- references/eval-patterns.md 11 KB
- references/fine-tuning-recipes.md 37 KB
- references/llmops-best-practices.md 6.5 KB
- references/model-migration-guide.md 9.8 KB
- references/multimodal-patterns.md 16 KB
- references/post-training.md 21 KB
- references/production-checklists.md 15 KB
- references/project-planning-patterns.md 9.3 KB
- references/prompt-engineering-patterns.md 6.2 KB
- references/rag-best-practices.md 9.8 KB
- references/structured-output-patterns.md 14 KB
- references/tokenizer-diagnostics.md 11 KB
- scripts/cost_estimator.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/prompt_eval_runner.py 6.6 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +2 lines ae65680966dd
- 12d ago First seen · 260 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 67926ad9a499
ai-llm is a skill published in the GitHub repository vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public (87 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 3,980 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
spark-environment-setup
Set up a working ML training/inference environment on NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, aarch64, CUDA 13). Use when installing PyTorch/Unsloth/TRL/vLLM on DGX Spark, hitting libcudart or wheel-ABI errors on aarch64, or choosing between NGC containers and bare pip installs.
spark-memory-thermal-ops
Manage unified memory and thermals during long-running ML jobs on NVIDIA DGX Spark. Use when planning memory headroom for a training run on GB10, when a job OOMs on unified memory, or when monitoring temperature and power during multi-hour training.
spark-training-gotchas
Preflight and diagnose the ten known failure modes for ML training on NVIDIA DGX Spark. Use when a training run on DGX Spark fails to start, OOMs below the 128GB limit, slows down mid-run, or before any multi-hour training job on GB10.
data-quality-frameworks
Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
airflow-dag-patterns
Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for operators, sensors, testing, and deployment. Use when creating data pipelines, orchestrating workflows, or scheduling batch jobs.
dbt-transformation-patterns
Master dbt (data build tool) for analytics engineering with model organization, testing, documentation, and incremental strategies. Use when building data transformations, creating data models, or implementing analytics engineering best practices.