foundations-consumer-neuroscience

foundations-consumer-neuroscience is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public. It costs 48 tokens per session (4,109 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of 12 consumer-neuroscience concepts for understanding attention, emotion, social connection, storytelling, memory, and reward in products and content.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to shape ethical user experiences, content, retention ideas, and neuroscience study designs, including checks related to the EU AI Act and DMCC.
Why use it?
It gives you a structured way to reason about engagement while keeping ethical limits visible. It helps explain why people notice, remember, anticipate, or connect with an experience.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: shipped in a Claude Code plugin, but also agents/openai.yaml present.

Part of the ai-agents plugin — 144 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to shape ethical user experiences, content, retention ideas, and neuroscience study designs, including checks related to the EU AI Act and DMCC.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public --skill foundations-consumer-neuroscience
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install ai-agents, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 144 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for foundations-consumer-neuroscience

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for foundations-consumer-neuroscience

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/foundations-consumer-neuroscience.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,109 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 174
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 179
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 198
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 180
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 475
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • low Excessive Agency · line 174
    Skill's behavior or capabilities extend beyond its stated purpose. Scope creep allows an agent to perform actions unrelated to its documented functionality, increasing the attack surface.
    Fix: Limit the skill's scope to its documented purpose. Remove instructions that enable the agent to perform actions outside its stated functionality.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.04109
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.01644
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00822
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00411

Measured 15d ago against content hash 15eb70077298, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

foundations-consumer-neuroscience scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/universal/foundations-consumer-neuroscience/SKILL.md · 166 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Consumer Neuroscience Foundations

Evaluate study validity and neural-data scope separately. The behavioural templates below generate hypotheses to test with behavioural outcomes; a brain-region label does not validate a design move.

When to Use

  • An agency or vendor pitches a neuromarketing study, an "engagement index", or a neural or biometric ad pre-test.
  • A team reports a lab signal (GSR spike, alpha asymmetry, fixation heatmap, emotion-AI score) and wants to act on it.
  • A product will capture EEG, fNIRS, HRV, GSR, eye movement, face or voice affect, and someone asks what law applies.
  • Someone is designing a copy, framing or narrative test and needs a behavioural hypothesis template (see the table below).

Skip it and use the owner instead:

  • Pricing, defaults, anchoring, dark-pattern and DMCC/CMA enforcement → foundations-behavioral-economics.
  • Generic score or survey reliability and validity with no physiological signal → foundations-measurement-theory.
  • Causal lift of a shipped change → foundations-causal-inference or an A/B test.
  • Usability or attention research without biometrics → software-ux-research.

Workflow

  1. Classify the ask: study purchase or evaluation, signal interpretation, neural-data law scope, or a behavioural design question (route the last to the templates below or to foundations-behavioral-economics).
  2. For a study or vendor: apply the four-part buy rule and the quick reference, then the vendor questions in references/neuro-study-validity.md.
  3. For any neural or biometric finding: fill the three evidence rows and refuse reverse inference.
  4. For data capture: classify the signal (neural vs downstream) before choosing the legal gate.
  5. Turn what survives into a behavioural hypothesis and an in-market test.

Evidence Contract

When a recommendation relies on a neural mechanism or biomarker, record three separate rows:

  • mechanism evidence: the process exists.
  • measurement evidence: this measure tracks that process in this task and population, at this n.
  • product-effect evidence: the intervention changes the user outcome in the field.

Read the full file on GitHub · 166 lines

Files

What ships with it

29 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 15d ago Changed · -10 lines 15eb70077298
  2. 22d ago Changed · -320 lines · +2 tokens per session 12e3289247b3
  3. 1mo ago Changed · +12 lines 105fb8ca3fd0
  4. 1mo ago First seen · 484 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A f565da077ada

Subscribe to this mod's changes

foundations-consumer-neuroscience is a skill published in the GitHub repository vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public (101 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 4,109 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

brand-landingpage

Brand-first landing page designer — runs a brand-identity interview (colors, typography, shape language), then generates and iterates on a polished landing page via Stitch with deployment-ready HTML. Use when the user asks to create, design, or build a landing page, homepage, or marketing page and has no established…

wshobson/agents · 112 tokens

wcag-audit-patterns

Conduct WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits with automated testing, manual verification, and remediation guidance. Use when auditing websites for accessibility, fixing WCAG violations, or implementing accessible design patterns.

wshobson/agents · 45 tokens

teach

Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the how and why skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 60 tokens

principle-experience-first

Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 37 tokens

principle-redesign-from-first-principles

Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 21 tokens

principle-exhaust-the-design-space

Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 41 tokens