Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-publicnpx agentmods add skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scoutWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public/research-arxiv-scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.03096 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01548 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00619 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
research-arxiv-scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
research-arxiv-scout
Use arXiv as a discovery layer for recent research, then produce repo-friendly outputs (ranked recommendations and 02_sources-*.json-style entries) without fabricating metrics.
Required attribution (arXiv API terms of use)
Include the following line in any output that uses arXiv data:
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability.
Source: this exact sentence is arXiv's requested attribution statement, published on the arXiv API Documentation page (info.arxiv.org/help/api/index.html, linked from data/sources.json) — not on the Terms of Use page (tou.html), which covers rate limits and permitted use but does not itself contain an attribution clause. Checked 2026-07-11.
Quick Reference
| Task | Inputs | Deliverable | Use these files |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scout for a known skill | Skill name | Ranked list + actions | config.yaml, assets/recommendation-output-template.md |
| Scout for a topic | Topic + categories | Ranked list + actions | references/category-taxonomy.md |
| Summarize one paper | arXiv ID | Single-paper summary | references/arxiv-api-guide.md |
| Propose sources updates | Target path | 02_sources-*.json entries |
assets/sources-json-template.md |
| Mine HCI/CSCW retention papers (killer-feature bundle handoff) | Commercial product / candidate feature_id | Rows on shared bundle ledger | references/product-retention-categories.md, config.yaml key killer-feature-retention |
Workflow
ASCII Flow
arXiv scout request
-> Map target to arXiv categories and keywords
-> Query arXiv metadata with date-aware parameters
-> Triage candidates for relevance, practicality, and evidence
-> Verify abstract URLs, IDs, titles, authors, and any code links
-> Produce ranked recommendations or sources-json entries
-> Include required arXiv attribution and final checklist
1) Map target to categories and keywords
- If the target matches a key in
config.yaml, use its categories, keywords, and time window. - Otherwise, pick 1-4 arXiv categories and 3-8 keywords using
references/category-taxonomy.md.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 307 B
- assets/recommendation-output-template.md 2.1 KB
- assets/sources-json-template.md 976 B
- config.yaml 5.1 KB
- data/sources.json 9.7 KB
- learnings.consolidated.md 596 B
- learnings.md 751 B
- references/arxiv-api-guide.md 9.2 KB
- references/category-taxonomy.md 1.4 KB
- references/product-retention-categories.md 6.7 KB
- scripts/generate_arxiv_scout_queries.py 12 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 201 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A e91cc2358332
research-arxiv-scout is a skill published in the GitHub repository vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public (87 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 3,096 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
arithmetic-evaluator
Evaluate arithmetic expressions and return numeric results. Use when a user asks an arithmetic question, requests calculation, or provides a math expression involving numbers, parentheses, and arithmetic operators.
conducting-scientific-research
Conduct rigorous, reproducible multi-step scientific work with literature, databases, local files, Python, R, shell, artifacts, reviewers, and approved compute. Use for evidence synthesis, data or statistical analysis, machine learning, simulation, study design, scientific figures or manuscripts, reproduction audits…
content-refinement-agent
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate…
section-writing-agent
Step 4 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). ONE single multimodal LLM call that drafts the remaining paper sections (Abstract, Methodology, Experiments, Conclusion), extracts numeric values from experimentallog.md into LaTeX booktabs tables, splices the generated figures from Step 2, and merges…
plotting-agent
Step 2 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the visualization plan from outline.json — render plots and conceptual diagrams from experimentallog.md and idea.md, optionally refine via VLM critique loop, and produce context-aware captions. Runs in parallel with the literature-review-agent. TRIGGER…
outline-agent
Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimentallog.md, template.tex, conferenceguidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator…