Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill codex-orchestrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vibeeval/vibecosystemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/codex-orchestration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/codex-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/codex-orchestration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/codex-orchestration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vibeeval/vibecosystem/codex-orchestration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Excessive Agency · line 140 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- high Excessive Agency · line 213 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 62 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 106 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 135 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 206 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.02355 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
codex-orchestration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex + Claude Code Orchestration
Guc Dagilimi Matrisi
| Yetenek | Codex CLI | Claude Code (Hizir) | Kazanan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiz | gpt-5.6-luna / max |
Claude adapter modeline bagli | Codex |
| Maliyet | Worker modeline ve kullanimina bagli | Claude pricing | Adapter'a bagli |
| Context window | Sinirli | 1M token | Claude Code |
| Multi-agent | YOK (tek agent) | 134+ agent swarm | Claude Code |
| Hook/self-learning | YOK | Tam destek (74 hook) | Claude Code |
| Memory/state | Stateless (her cagri bagimsiz) | Persistent memory | Claude Code |
| Code review | Basit lint | Derinlemesine + security | Claude Code |
| Bulk refactoring | Cok iyi (hiz+ucuz) | Iyi ama pahali | Codex |
| Mimari karar | Zayif | Guclu (architect agent) | Claude Code |
| Test yazma | Iyi | Iyi + TDD workflow | Esit |
| Security audit | Basit | 3-katman (SAST + review + manual) | Claude Code |
| CI/CD entegrasyonu | GitHub native | GitHub Actions + webhook | Esit |
Kullanim Senaryolari
Senaryo 1: Codex Implement, Claude Code Review
En yaygin ve etkili pattern.
1. Claude Code → plan.md olusturur (architect agent)
2. Codex → plan.md'ye gore implement eder (full-auto mode)
3. Codex → PR acar
4. Claude Code → PR review eder (code-reviewer + security-reviewer)
5. Codex → Review bulgularini fix eder
6. Claude Code → Final verify + merge onay
GitHub Actions Workflow:
# .github/workflows/codex-implement-claude-review.yml
name: Codex + Claude Code Pipeline
on:
issues:
types: [labeled]
jobs:
codex-implement:
if: contains(github.event.label.name, 'codex-task')
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Codex Implementation
env:
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }}
run: |
npx codex --approval-mode full-auto \
--quiet \
-q "Implement the task described in issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }}. Follow the plan if provided."
- name: Create PR
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
git checkout -b codex/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}
git add -A
git commit -m "feat: implement issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }} [codex]"
git push -u origin codex/issue-${{ github.event.issue.number }}
gh pr create --title "Codex: Issue #${{ github.event.issue.number }}" \
--body "Automated implementation by Codex CLI. Awaiting Claude Code review."
claude-review:
needs: codex-implement
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Claude Code Review
env:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
run: |
# claude-review workflow zaten mevcut
claude -p "Review the PR changes. Run code-reviewer + security-reviewer. Report findings."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 268 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A e35bbbca6d61
codex-orchestration is a skill published in the GitHub repository vibeeval/vibecosystem (529 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 2,355 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
event-planner
Event planning with timelines, budgets, vendor coordination, logistics checklists, and post-event evaluation. Use when organizing conferences, workshops, galas, or corporate events.
timeline-creator
Create HTML timelines and project roadmaps with Gantt charts, milestones, phase groupings, and progress indicators. Use when users request timelines, roadmaps, Gantt charts, project schedules, or milestone visualizations.
hr-talent
HR and talent management expertise for talent acquisition, performance management, compensation strategy, organizational design, culture building, succession planning, and D&I programs. Use when hiring, managing performance, designing organizations, or building culture.
leadership
Executive leadership expertise for decision-making, change management, crisis management, stakeholder management, team building, and organizational leadership. Use when leading teams, managing change, navigating crises, or developing leadership skills.
proposal-writer
Write a client proposal, quote, scope of work, or engagement letter for a service business. Covers project understanding, scope, timeline, pricing presentation, and terms. Use whenever the user asks for a proposal, quote, project proposal, client proposal, SOW, statement of work, engagement letter, or B2B service…
standup-summary
Tell Gemma what you did, what you're working on, and any blockers. Get a clean standup update.