Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Vigil-SOC/vigil --skill attack-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Vigil-SOC/vigilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigil-soc/vigil/attack-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigil-soc/vigil/attack-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigil-soc/vigil/attack-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vigil-soc/vigil/attack-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vigil-soc/vigil/attack-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01293 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00259 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00129 |
Grade A, and why
attack-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Attack mapping
Ground each technique id in an observable from this finding. The labelled block is the whole answer: write it first and always finish it, then at most two sentences. Keep every observable to a few words. Do not restate technique definitions. This turn may have no tools. If a tool is not callable, skip it and still write the block. Never end the turn on a lookup you announced.
Observables
From raw_data, description, and iocs, note only fields that are present:
- process and command line (
process,command_line) - parent (
parent_process) - network destination and port (
dst_ip,dst_domain,dst_host,dst_port) - auth event (account, source address,
failed_attempts,time_window) - file written
- registry key
- email artefact (sender, subject, link, or attachment)
Tools
Name a tool only when you hold it.
- If you hold
get_findingand the turn has an id but not the finding, call it. If the finding is already in the turn, do not call it. - If you hold
get_technique_rollupand it is callable, call it once.environmentisseenwhen that rollup's count for the technique id is greater than zero, andnot seenotherwise. - If you do not hold
get_technique_rollup, or it is not callable,environmentisnot checked. Never guess a count.
Status
Take mitre_techniques in listed order. An empty or missing list means there is nothing to confirm. For each id already on the finding:
confirmedwhen an observable shows that technique's behaviour. An id already listed is neveradded.wrong-sub-techniquewhen the behaviour is that family but the observable pins a different sub-technique.unsupportedwhen no observable shows it.
Then add an id that is not on the list only when an observable shows the behaviour. Prefer the sub-technique when the observable pins it; use the parent only when it does not. An added id's status is added. Apply a pin only when this finding has its observables. Do not emit a technique from a pin that did not match, and do not add a second technique for the same fact.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 69 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 710e8428527d
attack-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository Vigil-SOC/vigil (374 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,293 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-25.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-network-traffic-with-wireshark
Captures and analyzes network packet data using Wireshark and tshark to identify malicious traffic patterns, diagnose protocol issues, extract artifacts, and support incident response investigations on authorized network segments.
scrape-batch
Extract many known URLs in one polite, rate-limited pass. Use when the user hands over a list of links, a set of search hits to read in full, or asks to "scrape these pages" / "pull the content from all of them". Drives extract(action="batch"), which fans out with per-domain rate limiting and returns partial results…
compare
Structured comparison of 2+ alternatives with consistent criteria and decision matrix.
research-topic
Multi-step research orchestration. Use when user asks "research X", "summarize current state of Y", "what's the latest on Z", or compares approaches. Calls extract(action="agent") which searches the web, extracts top results, then synthesises a citation-preserving Markdown answer with one configured LLM.
temporal-query
Answer time-travel questions over stored memory — what was believed at a past point in time, when a belief changed, and what replaced it. Use when the user says "as of", "back in", "at the time", "history of", "timeline", "what did I think then", or asks why a current memory contradicts an older one.
knowledge-audit
Review and clean up stored memories — find duplicates, contradictions, stale entries, and consolidate.