Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/viktorinkov/shook/stenpx skills add viktorinkov/shook --skill stegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/viktorinkov/shookWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00658 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
ste scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 38 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 4bd1389296b9
ste is a skill published in the GitHub repository viktorinkov/shook (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 658 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
coding-agents-hooks-authoring
To author, register, and test Rosetta hooks, add a SemanticKind, or debug a hook that won't fire.
agenttrace-session-audit
Audit local AI coding-agent sessions with agenttrace. Use when the user asks to inspect Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, Qwen Code, Cline, Aider, Cursor exports, Hermes Agent, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Pi, Oh My Pi, Kimi CLI, Copilot-style logs, or generic JSON/JSONL traces for cost, tokens, tool failures, latency…
thesis-control
Use when AI-assisted thesis edits risk claim drift, scope creep, loss of author control, or repeated revisions that fail to converge; provides spine cards, edit contracts, drift audits, revision escalation, and human gates.
project-maintainer
Maintain an llmwiki-style open-source project across the full framework pipeline. Use when the user says "maintain the project", "check my tasks", "update progress", "run phase gate", "do a monthly verify", "lint my wiki", "check stale entries", or invokes any form of ongoing project-keeping chore. Reads progress.md…
manuscript-reframe
Reframe academic manuscript drafts that read like engineering reports, module inventories, internal validation packets, or system notes into paper-form scientific arguments with clear gap, contribution chain, results narrative, figure/table roles, AI-assisted component boundaries, and submission-readiness blockers.
argument-governance
Build and audit the manuscript argument system: intent, gap-contribution alignment, hierarchical claims, evidence balance, limitations, and reviewer attack surfaces. Use when a paper, thesis chapter, review article, or rebuttal needs explicit intent registers, contribution chains, claim hierarchy, argument maps…