Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vindm/dotclaude --skill ai-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vindm/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vindm/dotclaude/ai-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vindm/dotclaude/ai-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vindm/dotclaude/ai-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vindm/dotclaude/ai-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vindm/dotclaude/ai-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.03351 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.01340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00670 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00335 |
Grade A, and why
ai-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/dotclaude:ai-workflow — LLM workflow + cost discipline kit
You are setting up the AI-workflow safety layer — the discipline that prevents night-long eval runs from producing four-figure surprise bills, and that catches the mock-mode-bypass class of bug at the source rather than in the invoice.
The eval-cost-watcher agent is the showpiece. It reads the diff, counts fixtures, projects cost ranges, and suggests cheaper alternatives — all BEFORE the eval runs.
Phase 1 — Read the project's AI shape
Before any question:
-
Detect AI SDK presence — does the project actually have LLM calls?
grep -rln "@anthropic-ai/sdk\|openai\|@ai-sdk\|@google/generative-ai\|gemini\|claude" \ package.json Cargo.toml pyproject.toml requirements.txt 2>/dev/null | head grep -rn "from anthropic\|from openai\|import.*@anthropic" \ --include="*.py" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | head -10If NO AI dependencies, STOP. Report applicability check failed. Tell the user this skill doesn't apply.
-
AI workflow directories — find where prompts / configs / fixtures live:
find . -type d \( -name "ai" -o -name "llm" -o -name "prompts" -o -name "evals" \ -o -name "workflows" -o -name "agents" -o -name "fixtures" \) \ -not -path "*/node_modules/*" 2>/dev/null | head find . -path ./node_modules -prune -o \ \( -name "*.prompt.*" -o -name "*system-prompt*" -o -name "*instruction*" \) \ -print 2>/dev/null | head -
Eval suite — find the eval entry points:
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -A 2 '"scripts"' | grep -E "eval|test:ai|test:llm" find . -name "*.eval.*" -o -name "*eval*.py" -o -name "*eval*.ts" \ -not -path "*/node_modules/*" 2>/dev/null | head ls evals/ tests/eval/ tests/llm/ 2>/dev/null -
Model identifiers — read the config:
grep -rEn "MODEL_NAME|model.*=.*\"|model: ['\"]|MODEL_ID|model_id" \ --include="*.ts" --include="*.py" --include="*.json" --include="*.yaml" . \ 2>/dev/null | head -30Note which model tiers the project uses (frontier-large vs frontier-mid vs frontier-fast). Each tier swap is a 5-10× cost multiplier.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 186 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 62d046a1bdc4
ai-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository vindm/dotclaude (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 3,351 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-observability-promptfoo
Testing and evaluation framework for LLM prompts and applications -- promptfooconfig.yaml, assertions, model-graded evals, red teaming, CI/CD integration, custom providers, and comparative evaluation.
prompt-engineer-toolkit
Prompt engineering frameworks for building, testing, versioning, and evaluating prompts: chain-of-thought, few-shot, regression testing, and rubrics. Use when designing production prompts, running A/B tests, or building prompt libraries.
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
llm-evaluation
Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.
prompt-engineering-guidance
Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework.
emerging-techniques-model-merging
Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task…