Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/vinilana/dotcontext/pr-reviewnpx skills add vinilana/dotcontext --skill pr-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinilana/dotcontextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinilana/dotcontext/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinilana/dotcontext/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinilana/dotcontext/pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00622 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00249 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
PR Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review
Review pull requests for the @dotcontext/cli project against established patterns and quality standards.
When to Use
- Reviewing a PR before merge
- Validating changes during the Review (R) or Validation (V) phases
- Checking that a PR meets the project's architectural and testing standards
PR Review Process
1. Understand the Change Scope
Check which areas are affected:
# View changed files grouped by area
git diff main...HEAD --stat
Map changes to project layers:
src/services/mcp/-- MCP server and gateway toolssrc/services/<domain>/-- Service layer business logicsrc/generators/-- Scaffold generationsrc/workflow/-- PREVC workflow systemsrc/utils/-- Shared utilitiessrc/index.ts-- CLI command definitions.context/-- Documentation and scaffolding content
2. Verify the Commit History
This project uses Conventional Commits:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
Check that:
- Each commit has a valid type (
feat,fix,refactor,docs,test,chore) - Scope matches the primary area of change (see commit-message skill for scope list)
- Messages are in imperative mood ("add", not "added")
- Breaking changes use
!suffix andBREAKING CHANGE:footer
3. Architecture Review
Service Layer Compliance
- New services follow the directory-per-service pattern under
src/services/ - Services export through
index.tsbarrel files - Constructor accepts options object; async init is a separate method
- Dependencies are injectable (like
contextBuilderinAIContextMCPServer)
MCP Tool Changes
- Zod schemas have
.describe()on every parameter - Gateway handler covers all actions in the enum (no unreachable branches)
- Responses use
createJsonResponse/createErrorResponsefromresponse.ts - New types exported through
gatewayTools.tsbarrel - Total MCP tool count remains manageable (currently 9)
- Tool description strings include all action names for AI discovery
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 154 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 82f234190a90
PR Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinilana/dotcontext (565 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,245 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…