Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/vinilana/dotcontext/refactoringnpx skills add vinilana/dotcontext --skill refactoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinilana/dotcontextWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00707 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
Refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactoring
Safe, systematic refactoring procedures for the @dotcontext/cli codebase.
When to Use
- Extracting logic into a new service or utility
- Consolidating duplicate code across services or generators
- Restructuring MCP gateway handlers
- Improving type safety or removing
anyusage - Simplifying complex functions (high cyclomatic complexity)
- Migrating between patterns (e.g., callback to async/await)
Pre-Refactoring Checklist
Before starting any refactoring:
- All tests pass:
npm test - Build succeeds:
npm run build - Create a branch or ensure changes can be reverted
- Identify all callers of the code being refactored (use grep or IDE references)
Common Refactoring Scenarios
Extracting a New Service
The project follows a directory-per-service pattern. To extract logic into a new service:
- Create
src/services/<name>/directory - Create the service class:
// src/services/cache/cacheService.ts
export interface CacheServiceOptions {
repoPath: string;
cacheDir?: string;
}
export class CacheService {
private readonly repoPath: string;
private readonly cacheDir: string;
constructor(options: CacheServiceOptions) {
this.repoPath = options.repoPath;
this.cacheDir = options.cacheDir || '.context/.cache';
}
async get(key: string): Promise<string | null> { /* ... */ }
async set(key: string, value: string): Promise<void> { /* ... */ }
}
- Create
src/services/<name>/index.tsbarrel:
export { CacheService, CacheServiceOptions } from './cacheService';
- Update callers to import from the new service
- Write tests in
src/services/<name>/cacheService.test.ts
Splitting a Large Gateway Handler
Gateway handlers in src/services/mcp/gateway/ can grow large. To split:
- Identify action groups that share logic
- Extract helper functions within the same file first
- If helpers grow, extract into a separate utility or service
- Keep the main handler function as a thin dispatcher:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 177 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A f323f6e4bd4f
Refactoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinilana/dotcontext (561 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,414 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…