Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vinta/awesome-python --skill review-prsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vinta/awesome-pythonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/review-prs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/review-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinta/awesome-python/review-prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vinta/awesome-python/review-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vinta/awesome-python/review-prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 19 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01082 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00433 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
review-prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 314feee36b0e
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A f579d09b907f
review-prs is a skill published in the GitHub repository vinta/awesome-python (327,970 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,082 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sprr
Single PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review, validate, comment on, label, close, or merge one specific pull request that adds README.md entries. Triggers include "sprr", "review PR", "check PR", and "validate contribution".
bprr
Bulk PR reviewer for awesome-quant. Use when the user asks to review all open PRs, review unreviewed PRs, bulk review, or mentions "bprr". Reviews open PRs lacking the reviewed label and presents a summary before any merge/comment/label action.
git-workflow
Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes.
run-work
Execute a work unit end-to-end: sequence tasks by dependency, implement, test between tasks, commit, and track progress. Use to deliver a complete feature in one session. Invoked as /agiflow:run-work . Uses getworkunit, listtasks, updatetask, getworkunitprogress.
coding-standards
Universal coding standards, best practices, and patterns for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js development.
writing-modpack-changelog
Use when cutting a modpack release. Creates /docs/release-changelog.md if absent; appends a new version section with grouped changes. Triggers - 'cut a release', 'release notes', 'changelog', 'v1.2.3 changes', 'what changed since last version'.