Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/plugin install aidoc-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/doc-bdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/doc-bdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework/doc-bdd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.03009 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01504 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00602 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00301 |
Grade A, and why
doc-bdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
doc-bdd
Purpose
Create Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) scenarios — Layer 4 of the SDD
flow. A BDD suite translates EARS formal requirements into structured YAML
scenarios (Given/When/Then phase lists carried in a ```yaml block, NOT
Gherkin @-tags), each carrying an element-level ears: trace list and a
spec_trace link forward to the SPEC sections it exercises. (If a runner ever
needs .feature files, the YAML is the source of record and a .feature
emitter can be authored on demand — no such emitter ships today; the only
shipped transcoder is the one-off reverse-direction tools/gherkin_to_bdd_yaml.py
used to migrate legacy Gherkin into the YAML form.)
Layer: 4. Upstream: EARS (per the necessary-upstream contract; upstream PRD/BRD lineage is reachable transitively via the @-tag chain). Downstream: ADR → SPEC → TDD → IPLAN → Code.
BDD scenarios are the acceptance source of truth that TDD (Layer 7) maps to concrete test cases. Execution is QA-staging only — never run BDD in CI (use TDD unit/integration tests for CI).
When to Use
Use doc-bdd when:
- EARS (Layer 3) exists and you need executable acceptance scenarios.
- Validating EARS requirements with concrete Given-When-Then behaviors.
- Defining the req-to-SPEC trace bridge (
spec_trace) before ADR/SPEC.
For end-to-end generation from EARS, a prompt, or an IPLAN, use
../doc-bdd-autopilot/SKILL.md. Create upstream artifacts first; never invent
placeholders like EARS-XXX or reference documents that do not yet exist.
Prerequisites
BDD is Layer 4, so the required upstream EARS must already exist. Confirm it and read the spec before writing:
- Template (source of truth):
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/layers/04_BDD/BDD-TEMPLATE.yaml - Layer README:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/layers/04_BDD/README.md - ID & tag standards:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/ID_NAMING_STANDARDS.md - Authoring style:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/framework/governance/AUTHORING_STYLE.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 1345bea1733f
- 2d ago Changed fb6b05d9c907
- 6d ago First seen · 215 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 4e81b75ed83f
doc-bdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository vladm3105/aidoc-flow-framework (17 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 3,009 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.