AG Kit is a toolkit that gives Google Antigravity coding agents a structured workspace with rules, skills, specialist agents, workflows, persistent memory, orchestration, MCP guidance, and a safety hook. It is for building and operating agent workflows in Antigravity, and its catalogue entries provide parts of that workspace contract.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vudovn/ag-kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vudovn/ag-kit/main/.agents/skills/testing-patterns/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vudovn/ag-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vudovn/ag-kit/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vudovn/ag-kit/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vudovn/ag-kit/testing-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vudovn/ag-kit/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vudovn/ag-kit/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Memory Poisoning · line 89 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
- high Memory Poisoning · line 176 Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00871 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00348 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
6 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
- testing-patterns — 89% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Patterns
Principles for reliable test suites.
1. Testing Pyramid
/\ E2E (Few)
/ \ Critical flows
/----\
/ \ Integration (Some)
/--------\ API, DB queries
/ \
/------------\ Unit (Many)
Functions, classes
2. AAA Pattern
| Step | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Arrange | Set up test data |
| Act | Execute code under test |
| Assert | Verify outcome |
3. Test Type Selection
When to Use Each
| Type | Best For | Speed |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Pure functions, logic | Fast (<100ms) |
| Integration | API, DB, services | Medium |
| E2E | Critical user flows | Slow |
4. Unit Test Principles
Good Unit Tests
| Principle | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Fast | < 100ms each |
| Isolated | No external deps |
| Repeatable | Same result always |
| Self-checking | No manual verification |
| Timely | Written with code |
What to Unit Test
| Test | Don't Test |
|---|---|
| Business logic | Framework code |
| Edge cases | Third-party libs |
| Error handling | Simple getters |
5. Integration Test Principles
What to Test
| Area | Focus |
|---|---|
| API endpoints | Request/response |
| Database | Queries, transactions |
| External services | Contracts |
Setup/Teardown
| Phase | Action |
|---|---|
| Before All | Connect resources |
| Before Each | Reset state |
| After Each | Clean up |
| After All | Disconnect |
6. Mocking Principles
When to Mock
| Mock | Don't Mock |
|---|---|
| External APIs | The code under test |
| Database (unit) | Simple dependencies |
| Time/random | Pure functions |
| Network | In-memory stores |
Mock Types
| Type | Use |
|---|---|
| Stub | Return fixed values |
| Spy | Track calls |
| Mock | Set expectations |
| Fake | Simplified implementation |
7. Test Organization
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 181 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 72f7e12eff41
testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository vudovn/ag-kit (8,199 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 871 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
JMeter Load Testing
Load and performance testing skill using Apache JMeter, covering test plans, thread groups, assertions, listeners, timers, and distributed testing.
06-test
Write and iterate developer-side tests until they pass, or validate a user journey end to end in the browser during implementation. Use when the user wants to add coverage, find what's untested, or walk a flow while building it. Do NOT use for independent acceptance QA or reviewer evidence, auditing test health, or…