Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add vyuh-labs/dxkit --skill dxkit-learngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vyuh-labs/dxkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/vyuh-labs/dxkit/dxkit-learn)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vyuh-labs/dxkit/dxkit-learn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vyuh-labs/dxkit/dxkit-learn/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/vyuh-labs/dxkit/dxkit-learn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/vyuh-labs/dxkit/dxkit-learn.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 12 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 26 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 37 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 58 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 62 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 97 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 98 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 99 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 100 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 127 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 131 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 132 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 134 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02339 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00936 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00468 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
dxkit-learn scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
dxkit-learn
This skill explains how dxkit works. Reach for it when the user asks about dxkit concepts before they take an action.
Mental model
dxkit measures a codebase along 6 dimensions (Security, Code Quality, Tests, Documentation, Maintainability, Developer Experience) using deterministic scanners (gitleaks, semgrep, cloc, jscpd, graphify, ruff, eslint, …). Findings are anchored to a baseline (.dxkit/baselines/main.json) so today's pre-existing issues don't block tomorrow's PR. A guardrail check diffs current state against the baseline and blocks net-new regressions; two additive contract gates ride the same check when configured — flow (net-new broken UI→API integrations) and schema drift (breaking data-model changes, opt-in). Hooks + CI wire the guardrail into the developer's workflow.
The three contracts to remember:
- Baseline = the brownfield anchor. Pre-existing findings are recorded once; future scans only block on additions.
- Hooks fire fast (pre-push); CI fires thorough. Both use the same guardrail logic.
- Reports are deterministic — same code + same baseline = same findings. The salt mode (
deterministicvsrandom) controls per-finding identity stability across runs.
Discovering the full capability set (don't rely on this list staying complete)
dxkit's capabilities grow. Rather than trust a hand-written list, read the live capability registry — the single source of truth for what dxkit can do:
npx vyuh-dxkit capabilities --json
This returns every capability with its group, one-line summary, the dxkit-*
skill that drives it, and — grounded in this repo — which ones are
recommended (capabilities the repo would benefit from but isn't using yet).
It never drifts: a new capability appears here the moment it ships.
Pair it with the repo-grounded advice from doctor:
npx vyuh-dxkit doctor --json # .recommendations[] = what to adopt here, with the command to run
When a user asks "what can dxkit do for me?" or "what should I set up here?",
read those two, then propose the fitting capabilities and drive each through
its skill (the skill field tells you which). This is how a user configures
dxkit by talking to you — the menu is machine-readable so you never guess.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A a59cc40df921
dxkit-learn is a skill published in the GitHub repository vyuh-labs/dxkit (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,339 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Code Coverage Analysis
Measure and enforce test coverage with Istanbul/nyc, c8, Jest, and Vitest. Covers branch versus line coverage, per-directory thresholds, CI gates, and correctly excluding generated code from reports.
release-habit-hooks
Cut a new release of the habit-hooks packages. Use when asked to release, publish, or bump the version. Reviews what lands, enforces the in-sync versioning rule, validates the changelog, and drives the tag-triggered PyPI publish.
habit-hooks-review
Spawn a reviewer sub-agent to assess a change set against habit-hooks's coding principles. Use AFTER habit-hooks reports clean — habit-hooks catches structural smells; this catches what it cannot (correctness, tests, design, missed edge cases).
duo-build
Build an issue or feature interactively toward an indexed shared goal, with automatic read-only peer review; resume the same run across Claude Code and Codex.
specflow
Spec-driven development with executable contracts.
specflow-loop-selector
Choose the lightest Specflow workflow that covers an ask’s size, uncertainty and risk, then select a loop only when needed. Use for work triage, proportionate verification, loop selection, or explicit spec-build, feature-build and Gate D requests. A lightweight decision does not start a loop.