Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00278 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Structured code review covering security, performance, correctness, and maintainability. Works on diffs, PRs, files, or pasted code snippets.
Review Dimensions
Security
- SQL injection, XSS, CSRF
- Authentication and authorization flaws
- Secrets or credentials in code
- Insecure deserialization
- Path traversal
- SSRF
Performance
- N+1 queries
- Unnecessary memory allocations
- Algorithmic complexity (O(n²) in hot paths)
- Missing database indexes
- Unbounded queries or loops
- Resource leaks
Correctness
- Edge cases (empty input, null, overflow)
- Race conditions and concurrency issues
- Error handling and propagation
- Off-by-one errors
- Type safety
Maintainability
- Naming clarity
- Single responsibility
- Duplication
- Test coverage
- Documentation for non-obvious logic
Output Format
Rate each dimension and provide specific, actionable findings with file and line references. Prioritize critical issues first. Always include positive observations alongside issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 45 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 3612de8f2c89
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository w95/awesome-claude-corporate-skills (198 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 278 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Reviews code for quality, security, correctness. Triggers: code review, quality review, security review, review PR, review branch.
architecture-audit
Audits codebase for architectural friction, shallow modules; proposes RFCs. Triggers: improve architecture, shallow modules, deepen modules, reduce coupling.
refactor
Refactors code for quality and maintainability. Triggers: refactor, clean up, restructure, improve code, modernize.
clean-code
Code quality: meaningful names, SRP, DRY, small functions, guard clauses, refactoring. Triggers: clean code, naming, code smell, SRP, DRY, long function, god class, dead code.
predict
Analyzes diffs for regression risk and blast radius, generates risk-scored impact report. Triggers: PR review, code change risk, breaking change, blast radius, regression check.
refactor-plan
Creates detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via interview, files as GitHub RFC. Triggers: refactor plan, refactoring RFC, incremental refactor, safe steps.