Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control --skill cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokensgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-controlWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control/cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00227 | $0.01321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00113 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Long CJK structured output truncates JSON — budget ~2× tokens, and salvage the rest
Problem
You ask an OpenAI-compatible LLM for a long JSON report. In English it returns valid JSON. In Chinese
(or Japanese/Korean) the identical request returns a string that starts with valid JSON but is cut off
mid-object → json.loads fails, your regex \{.*\} grabs an unbalanced blob, and you get "no parseable JSON".
Why
- CJK is token-dense. One Han character is often 1–2 BPE tokens; English averages ~0.25 tokens/char. The
same report is ~1.5–2× more output tokens in Chinese. A
max_tokensthat comfortably fit the English report truncates the Chinese one. - Per-model output caps differ and some are low. Requesting
max_tokensabove a model's hard cap is either rejected (400 ... Range of max_tokens should be [1, 8192]) or silently clamped, then the long CJK report truncates. Observed: qwen-max hard-caps at 8192 (can't emit a full Chinese report); glm-4.6 / minimax ≈16K; qwen-plus / qwen3-235b / glm-5.2 / kimi / deepseek handle 24–32K. Reasoning models also spend tokens onreasoning_contentbefore the JSON, compounding it.
Fix
- Budget ~2× the English max_tokens for CJK (e.g. 16000–32000 for a full report), per model, up to its cap.
- Probe the cap if a
400appears — binary-searchmax_tokens(a tiny call that 400s vs 200s reveals the ceiling). For reasoning models, leave headroom forreasoning_content. - Salvage truncated JSON instead of failing — close the object after the last complete top-level section.
Walk the string tracking brace/bracket depth and string/escape state; record the index each time depth returns
to 1 (a top-level value just closed); cut there and append
}:
Truncation then degrades gracefully — the report keeps its complete sections, and the missing tail shows up as lower "comprehensiveness" in scoring rather than a hard failure.def salvage(c): s = c[c.find("{"):]; depth=0; instr=False; esc=False; cut=None for i,ch in enumerate(s): if esc: esc=False; continue if instr: if ch=="\\": esc=True elif ch=='"': instr=False continue if ch=='"': instr=True elif ch in "{[": depth+=1 elif ch in "}]": depth-=1 if depth==1: cut=i+1 if cut: try: d=json.loads(s[:cut].rstrip().rstrip(",")+"}") if isinstance(d,dict) and len(d)>=MIN_SECTIONS: return d except Exception: pass return None - Also strip reasoning prefixes before parsing: some models inline chain-of-thought as
<think>…</think>before the JSON (MiniMax-M3) —re.sub(r"(?is)^.*?</think>","",c)first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 86 lines · 227 tokens per session scan A d7218f2a8f2c
cjk-structured-llm-output-truncates-json-needs-2x-tokens is a skill published in the GitHub repository wan-huiyan/agent-traffic-control (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 227 tokens to every session and 1,321 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cloudflare-workers-ai
Cloudflare Workers AI for serverless GPU inference. Use for LLMs, text/image generation, embeddings, or encountering AIERROR, rate limits, token exceeded errors.
prompt-mini
Forges weak Claude Code prompts into structured, credit-saving, framework-aware prompts. Use when prompts are vague, missing scope, or mention a stack without clear task definition.
fable-prompting
Reference for prompting Claude Fable 5 — how Fable prompting differs from Opus/Sonnet-era prompting, effort-level selection, and the verbatim steering snippets. Use when writing or editing prompts, subagent definitions, or slash commands that target Fable 5, or when a Fable-driven pipeline misbehaves (overplanning…
skill-meta-prompt
Craft better prompts using proven optimization techniques — use when your prompt needs refinement.
ai-workflow-architect
Designs AI systems, automations, and agent workflows for a business — identifying which manual work is worth automating, how to structure the system, which tools fit, and what could go wrong. Use this to automate part of an operation, design an agent or MCP workflow, reduce repetitive manual work, connect tools into a…
cloudflare-vectorize
Cloudflare Vectorize vector database for semantic search and RAG. Use for vector indexes, embeddings, similarity search, or encountering dimension mismatches, filter errors.