STAR: Skill for Codex

.agents/skills/star-proj-adopt/SKILL.md

star-proj-adopt is a skill for Codex from wanghao9610/STAR. It costs 57 tokens per session (2,793 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for bringing an existing or unfinished research project into STAR, a structured system for organizing research work. It first surveys the repository and records how its code, data, models, outputs, and history fit the system.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect a research repository, identify its entry points and files, map it to STAR conventions, and prepare it for the rest of the research workflow.
Why use it?
It helps organize a project that was not originally created from the STAR template while keeping the existing project intact.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions subagents; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is wanghao9610/STAR's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on STAR itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything STAR configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to wanghao9610/STAR. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wanghao9610/STAR/main/.agents/skills/star-proj-adopt/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanghao9610/STAR

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for star-proj-adopt

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for star-proj-adopt

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanghao9610/star/star-proj-adopt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 57 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,793 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Anti-Refusal · line 21
    Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.
    Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 19
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00057 $0.02793
Opus 5.5 $0.00023 $0.01117
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00559
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00279

Measured 14d ago against content hash 902fe47f1a43, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

star-proj-adopt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/star-proj-adopt/SKILL.md · 92 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Research Project Adopt — bring an in-progress project into STAR

Invocation: star-proj-adopt [survey | backfill] [DESCRIPTION]. Resolve the phase first: no adoption record selects survey; an adoption record plus a decomposed tree selects backfill; an explicit phase wins. Re-running survey updates the record. Natural language may settle mappings, selected historical runs, or backfill rows within its stated scope.

Shared conventions. Follow docs/mds/star-workflow/research-workflow-conventions.md for scope, authority, .env controls (STAR_LANG, INVOLVE, STAR_*_MODEL), runtime, language and provenance. Its opening loading rule selects the sections and localized resources this task needs.

Passing a tier model. Before delegation, read conventions §6 (scope and independent context), §10.8 (tier selection), and the current harness entry in §13 (model and depth controls).

Role

Every other STAR skill assumes a project begun from the template: .env configured, layout in place, plans under metds/plans/ describing work not yet done. You exist for the project that did not — real code, a working environment, months of commits, results in hand. You make it legible to the rest of the family without asking it to change: nothing moves, nothing is renamed, nothing already written is overwritten.

You are the on-ramp, not the driver. You do not survey the code architecture (star-code-architect Branch B owns that), do not author research strategy (star-plan-coach and star-plan-decomposer own the plan tree), and do not judge results (star-expt-analyst). You establish the runtime, record what exists as evidence, and later reconcile it with the tree the coach and decomposer build.

Core Principles

  1. Never overwrite, never move, never rename. Existing files keep their content, directories their location and name, and STAR uses the working environment already present. When a proposed write conflicts, honor any specific handling already authorized; otherwise show the content and ask because valuable existing work is at stake. CODE_NAME keeps the source directory's current name.
  2. Reach large directories, do not relocate them. Existing data and weights are wired in with symlinks at datas/ and inits/ so DATA_DIR / INIT_DIR resolve, while every absolute path in existing code and scripts keeps working. wkdrs/ stays a real directory, because git refuses every path behind a symlink and the run records under it must stay stageable (conventions §1.6); prior output trees are reached from inside it, one wkdrs/<run>/output link per chosen run (references/adopt_spec.md §6). A directory already in the right place needs no link; a link is never created over a non-empty real directory.
  3. Evidence, not recall. Every row of the work inventory cites its source — a path, a commit, a script, a log line. What the repository does not show is recorded as unknown and asked about, never inferred from the shape of a typical project.
  4. Reconstruction is always labeled. A record written after the fact is not an execution record. Every historical run recorded this way carries a header: reconstructed during adoption, on what date, from what evidence — so no later reader mistakes it for star-plan-executor output.
  5. Adoption does not invent research strategy. You can read what was built and run; not why, what claim it serves, or what would have killed it. The inventory stays descriptive; §4-style claims and kill-criteria are left for star-plan-coach to elicit from the user. A plan tree fabricated from a git log is worse than no plan tree.
  6. The narrow write on plans. metds/plans/* belongs to the coach, decomposer, executor, and reviser. The sole exception is exec_status: and exec_runs: on leaves in backfill, limited to rows the user has already selected or accepts from the visible proposal. Plan bodies and all other state remain untouched.
  7. Settle three material choices; automate the rest. Before dependent writes, settle the survey mapping, which historical runs to record, and the proposed backfill rows. Apply clear choices already present in the request or session; ask only for unresolved rows or mappings under conventions §7.2 and §7.7.

Read the full file on GitHub · 92 lines

Files

What ships with it

9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 14d ago Changed 902fe47f1a43
  2. 1mo ago Changed ddd43e580cc4
  3. 2mo ago Changed · -25 lines · -151 tokens per session ca97aaefed54
  4. 2mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 208 tokens per session scan A 2b74c7a758ff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

star-proj-adopt is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanghao9610/STAR (54 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,793 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

star-proj-adopt compared with skills from other repositories

star-proj-adopt next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
star-proj-adoptwanghao9610/STARSkill542d agoMITA57Codex
create-workflowLazyAGI/LazyMindSkill589yesterdayApache-2.0A0Claude Code, Codex
task-prd-creatorcoco-research/cocoSkill785yesterdayApache-2.0A55Claude Code, Codex
personal-document-searchLazyAGI/LazyMindSkill589yesterdayApache-2.0A72Claude Code, Codex
ui-resilient-accessibilityLazyAGI/LazyMindSkill589yesterdayApache-2.0A39Claude Code, Codex
ui-safe-form-patternsLazyAGI/LazyMindSkill589yesterdayApache-2.0A50Claude Code, Codex
ui-secure-reviewLazyAGI/LazyMindSkill589yesterdayApache-2.0A51Claude Code, Codex