Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers --skill profile-hypershiftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/profile-hypershift)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/profile-hypershift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/profile-hypershift/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/profile-hypershift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers/profile-hypershift.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00483 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00242 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
HyperShift Project Profile scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to hypershift-code-review — 8 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
HyperShift Project Profile
This profile provides project-specific review guidance for the openshift/hypershift repository. Instead of embedding domain knowledge, it points to the agents and skills already defined in the hypershift repo's .claude/ directory.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when --profile hypershift is specified.
Agents
The hypershift repository maintains its own Gemini agents at .claude/agents/ that contain deep domain expertise (API, cloud providers, control plane, data plane, architecture). During review:
- If inside a local hypershift checkout: Read the agent definitions from
.claude/agents/in the repo root. Pick the agents relevant to the changed files based on each agent's own description, and launch them as sub-agents. - If not in a hypershift checkout: Fetch the agent definitions using
gh api repos/openshift/hypershift/contents/.claude/agents?ref=main(or the GitHub contents API) and use them. - Use all HyperShift SME agents including (control-plane-sme, data-plane-sme, api-sme, cloud-provider-sme and hcp-architect-sme) to review branch changes or a given PR, questioning the approach and whether it solves the underlying problem.
The repo also has skills at .claude/skills/ (code formatting, debugging, effective Go, git commit format, CLI conventions). Apply any that are relevant to the changed files.
Build Commands
make test— unit tests with race detectionmake verify— full verification suite (code generation, formatting, vetting, linting, tests)make api— required if any files inapi/were modified; regenerates deepcopy, clients, informers, and listers
API Type Changes
If any files in the api/ directory were modified, verify that make api has been run and the generated files are included in the diff. Missing generated files are a blocking issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 33 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 9335d74b8f8a
HyperShift Project Profile is a skill published in the GitHub repository wangke19/gemini-ai-helpers (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 483 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to hypershift-code-review, differing in 8 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-kitty-mission-review
Review a fully merged Spec Kitty mission post-merge (all WPs done/approved) to verify spec→code fidelity, FR coverage, drift, risks, and security. Triggers: "review the merged mission", "post-merge mission review", "verify the completed mission", "audit the mission implementation", "mission-level acceptance review"…
simplify
This skill should be used when the user asks to "simplify", "clean up the diff", "run simplify", "simplify the changes", "review changed code for cleanup", explicitly invokes "/simplify", or asks to "commit without simplify", "skip simplify for this commit", or "commit this but skip simplify". Reviews changed code…
spk-gate-accept
Run the Spec Kitty accept gate for a completed mission and verify final readiness before merge.
resolve-pr-comments
This skill should be used when user asks to "address PR comments", "resolve PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR issues", "respond to PR review", or explicitly invokes "resolve-pr-comments".
onboard-repo
Index an unfamiliar codebase into the knowledge graph, then produce a first orientation map -- entry points, most-depended-upon modules, hotspots, test topology.
code-review-checklist
Comprehensive checklist for conducting thorough code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, and maintainability.