ARIS is a collection of Markdown-based skills that define a workflow for autonomous machine-learning research, including idea discovery, experiment automation, and review loops. Researchers and AI coding agents use it across tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw without depending on a single framework. The catalogue entries are ARIS workflow skills and agents.
Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleepnpx agentmods add skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket warn
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 41 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 373 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 375 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 377 Skill allows unbounded resource consumption (API calls, storage, compute). Without rate limits or quotas, a compromised or misbehaving agent can cause denial-of-service or cost overruns.Fix: Set explicit rate limits, timeouts, and resource quotas for API calls, file operations, and compute. Implement circuit breakers for runaway loops.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.05731 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.02865 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00573 |
Grade A, and why
research-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 391 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Full Research Pipeline: Idea → Experiments → Submission
⏱ External cadence: non-judgmental heartbeat only. An overnight
/loop/CronCreateheartbeat may wake, detect a stalled phase (no progress, dead process, blocked on a freed resource) and nudge it forward — it may NEVER decide the work is good (paper good enough, proof holds, claim supported). Every such verdict stays on its own skill's internal cadence and terminates in the cross-model jury. A heartbeat may say "keep going," never "good enough." Seeshared-references/external-cadence.md(overnight-pipeline rule + stall detection & forced structural pivot). At heartbeat startup, touch the run state first each tick and register this run with the watchdoglooptype (so a silent death surfaces as STALE); unregister on completion. The watchdog only detects — it never acquits. Each tick also record the new-finding count via theiteration_log.pyhelper (resolve through the canonical.aris/tools → tools → $ARIS_REPO/tools → $ARIS_REPO/tools via ~/.aris/repochain, integration-contract §2; warn-and-skip if unresolved):python3 "$ITER_LOG" note <root> <run_id> <phase> <n>. On the returnedpivot=structural(stale ≥ 2) the nudge must change a STRUCTURAL constraint and pick an untried direction; onpivot=human(stale ≥ 4) flag for attention. Counting only — never a quality verdict.
End-to-end autonomous research workflow for: $ARGUMENTS
Constants
- AUTO_PROCEED = true — When
true, every selection checkpoint is informational: report the choice and continue in the same turn. Whenfalse, ask for explicit user confirmation and end the turn at the checkpoint. - ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = false — When
true,/research-litdownloads the top relevant arXiv PDFs during literature survey. Whenfalse(default), only fetches metadata via arXiv API. Passed through to/idea-discovery→/research-lit. - HUMAN_CHECKPOINT = false — When
true, the auto-review loops (Stage 3) pause after each round's review to let you see the score and provide custom modification instructions before fixes are implemented. Whenfalse(default), loops run fully autonomously. Passed through to/auto-review-loop. - REVIEWER_DIFFICULTY = medium — How adversarial the reviewer is.
medium(default): standard MCP review.hard: adds reviewer memory + debate protocol.nightmare: GPT reads repo directly viacodex exec+ memory + debate. Passed through to/auto-review-loop. - CODE_REVIEW = true — GPT-6-Astra xhigh reviews experiment code before deployment. Catches logic bugs before wasting GPU hours. Set
falseto skip. Passed through to/experiment-bridge. - BASE_REPO = false — GitHub repo URL to use as base codebase. When set,
/experiment-bridgeclones the repo first and implements experiments on top of it. Whenfalse(default), writes code from scratch or reuses existing project files. Passed through to/experiment-bridge. - COMPACT = false — When
true, generates compact summary files for short-context models and session recovery. Passed through to/idea-discoveryand/experiment-bridge. - AUTO_WRITE = false — When
true, automatically invoke Workflow 3 (/paper-writing) after Stage 4.VENUEis needed only when Stage 5 begins — a missing venue defers paper writing; it never blocks Stages 1-4. Whenfalse(default), Stage 4 generatesNARRATIVE_REPORT.mdand stops — user invokes/paper-writingmanually. - VENUE = (unset) — Target venue for paper writing; bound only when Stage 5 begins. Options:
ICLR,NeurIPS,ICML,CVPR,ACL,AAAI,ACM,IEEE_CONF,IEEE_JOURNAL. No default: a missing venue defers paper writing — it never blocks Stages 1-4 and is never guessed. - RENDER_HTML = true — When
true(default), auto-renderNARRATIVE_REPORT.mdto HTML at Stage 4 completion via/render-html. Uses--no-review(this is an internal handoff doc to/paper-writing, not a reviewer-facing final artifact — the upstream Stage 3 auto-review loop already cross-model-reviewed the claims). Setfalseto skip, or pass— render html: false. Non-blocking: if/render-htmlfails or Codex MCP is unavailable, log the failure and continue — the HTML view is a nice-to-have, not a Stage 4 prerequisite.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 3dd1f071770f
- 9d ago First seen · 391 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 8e6e55141e44
research-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep (16,030 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 5,731 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
remote-compute-ssh
Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.
figure-style
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a…
evo2
Score, embed, and generate DNA sequences with Evo 2, a long-context genomic foundation model. Use this skill when: (1) Computing per-nucleotide or per-sequence likelihoods for variant effect scoring, (2) Embedding genomic windows for downstream classification, (3) Generating DNA conditioned on a prefix, (4) Scoring…
ligandmpnn
Inverse-fold a backbone with ligand, nucleic-acid, and metal context using LigandMPNN (Dauparas et al. 2023, github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN). Reach for this skill to redesign the residues lining a binding pocket around a bound small molecule or cofactor, to design metal-coordinating sites where the geometry must be…
memory
Cross-project research memory. Deep-dive past projects' notes, record corrections, and save cross-project insights across all Luxas research projects.
ml-training-recipes
Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning…