research-pipeline

research-pipeline is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep. It costs 66 tokens per session (5,731 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for taking a broad research direction through experiments, external review, and preparation of a final paper PDF.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to discover ideas, run experiments, review the work, and prepare the resulting paper.
Why use it?
It gives a research project a connected path from the first idea to a polished submission.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: allowed-tools in frontmatter, but also runs codex exec. Also seen: mentions Claude Code; mentions Codex.

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is [`shared-references/external-cadence.md`](../shared-references/external-cadence.md).

Good fit Use it to discover ideas, run experiments, review the work, and prepare the resulting paper.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
About the project

ARIS is a collection of Markdown-based skills that define a workflow for autonomous machine-learning research, including idea discovery, experiment automation, and review loops. Researchers and AI coding agents use it across tools such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw without depending on a single framework. The catalogue entries are ARIS workflow skills and agents.

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep · 16,030 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for research-pipeline

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for research-pipeline

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/wanshuiyin/auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/research-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,731 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket warn 18 Apr 2026
  • Snyk warn 18 Apr 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Rogue Agent · line 41
    Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.
    Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 373
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 375
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 377
    Skill allows unbounded resource consumption (API calls, storage, compute). Without rate limits or quotas, a compromised or misbehaving agent can cause denial-of-service or cost overruns.
    Fix: Set explicit rate limits, timeouts, and resource quotas for API calls, file operations, and compute. Implement circuit breakers for runaway loops.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.05731
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.02865
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.01146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00573

Measured 5d ago against content hash 3dd1f071770f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

research-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/research-pipeline/SKILL.md · 391 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 391 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Full Research Pipeline: Idea → Experiments → Submission

External cadence: non-judgmental heartbeat only. An overnight /loop / CronCreate heartbeat may wake, detect a stalled phase (no progress, dead process, blocked on a freed resource) and nudge it forward — it may NEVER decide the work is good (paper good enough, proof holds, claim supported). Every such verdict stays on its own skill's internal cadence and terminates in the cross-model jury. A heartbeat may say "keep going," never "good enough." See shared-references/external-cadence.md (overnight-pipeline rule + stall detection & forced structural pivot). At heartbeat startup, touch the run state first each tick and register this run with the watchdog loop type (so a silent death surfaces as STALE); unregister on completion. The watchdog only detects — it never acquits. Each tick also record the new-finding count via the iteration_log.py helper (resolve through the canonical .aris/tools → tools → $ARIS_REPO/tools → $ARIS_REPO/tools via ~/.aris/repo chain, integration-contract §2; warn-and-skip if unresolved): python3 "$ITER_LOG" note <root> <run_id> <phase> <n>. On the returned pivot=structural (stale ≥ 2) the nudge must change a STRUCTURAL constraint and pick an untried direction; on pivot=human (stale ≥ 4) flag for attention. Counting only — never a quality verdict.

End-to-end autonomous research workflow for: $ARGUMENTS

Constants

  • AUTO_PROCEED = true — When true, every selection checkpoint is informational: report the choice and continue in the same turn. When false, ask for explicit user confirmation and end the turn at the checkpoint.
  • ARXIV_DOWNLOAD = false — When true, /research-lit downloads the top relevant arXiv PDFs during literature survey. When false (default), only fetches metadata via arXiv API. Passed through to /idea-discovery/research-lit.
  • HUMAN_CHECKPOINT = false — When true, the auto-review loops (Stage 3) pause after each round's review to let you see the score and provide custom modification instructions before fixes are implemented. When false (default), loops run fully autonomously. Passed through to /auto-review-loop.
  • REVIEWER_DIFFICULTY = medium — How adversarial the reviewer is. medium (default): standard MCP review. hard: adds reviewer memory + debate protocol. nightmare: GPT reads repo directly via codex exec + memory + debate. Passed through to /auto-review-loop.
  • CODE_REVIEW = true — GPT-6-Astra xhigh reviews experiment code before deployment. Catches logic bugs before wasting GPU hours. Set false to skip. Passed through to /experiment-bridge.
  • BASE_REPO = false — GitHub repo URL to use as base codebase. When set, /experiment-bridge clones the repo first and implements experiments on top of it. When false (default), writes code from scratch or reuses existing project files. Passed through to /experiment-bridge.
  • COMPACT = false — When true, generates compact summary files for short-context models and session recovery. Passed through to /idea-discovery and /experiment-bridge.
  • AUTO_WRITE = false — When true, automatically invoke Workflow 3 (/paper-writing) after Stage 4. VENUE is needed only when Stage 5 begins — a missing venue defers paper writing; it never blocks Stages 1-4. When false (default), Stage 4 generates NARRATIVE_REPORT.md and stops — user invokes /paper-writing manually.
  • VENUE = (unset) — Target venue for paper writing; bound only when Stage 5 begins. Options: ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ACL, AAAI, ACM, IEEE_CONF, IEEE_JOURNAL. No default: a missing venue defers paper writing — it never blocks Stages 1-4 and is never guessed.
  • RENDER_HTML = true — When true (default), auto-render NARRATIVE_REPORT.md to HTML at Stage 4 completion via /render-html. Uses --no-review (this is an internal handoff doc to /paper-writing, not a reviewer-facing final artifact — the upstream Stage 3 auto-review loop already cross-model-reviewed the claims). Set false to skip, or pass — render html: false. Non-blocking: if /render-html fails or Codex MCP is unavailable, log the failure and continue — the HTML view is a nice-to-have, not a Stage 4 prerequisite.

Read the full file on GitHub · 391 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago Changed 3dd1f071770f
  2. 9d ago First seen · 391 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 8e6e55141e44

Subscribe to this mod's changes

research-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep (16,030 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 5,731 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

remote-compute-ssh

Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.

aipoch/open-science · 53 tokens

figure-style

Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a…

aipoch/open-science · 91 tokens

evo2

Score, embed, and generate DNA sequences with Evo 2, a long-context genomic foundation model. Use this skill when: (1) Computing per-nucleotide or per-sequence likelihoods for variant effect scoring, (2) Embedding genomic windows for downstream classification, (3) Generating DNA conditioned on a prefix, (4) Scoring…

aipoch/open-science · 83 tokens

ligandmpnn

Inverse-fold a backbone with ligand, nucleic-acid, and metal context using LigandMPNN (Dauparas et al. 2023, github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN). Reach for this skill to redesign the residues lining a binding pocket around a bound small molecule or cofactor, to design metal-coordinating sites where the geometry must be…

aipoch/open-science · 100 tokens

memory

Cross-project research memory. Deep-dive past projects' notes, record corrections, and save cross-project insights across all Luxas research projects.

Muuuun/luxas · 30 tokens

ml-training-recipes

Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning…

Orchestra-Research/AI-Research-SKILLs · 88 tokens