common-skills: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/pr-walkthrough/SKILL.md

pr-walkthrough is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from warpdotdev/common-skills. It costs 52 tokens per session (6,260 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A local interactive D3 walkthrough that explains a pull request through four views: system overview, data flow, code dependencies, and user actions. D3 is a JavaScript library for building interactive visualizations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create a zoomable PR map or canvas that explains affected system components, requests, files, assets, rendered output, code entry points, and user actions.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers understand unfamiliar code and how its parts connect before examining the changes in detail. The separate views show architecture, movement of data, dependencies, and user interactions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is warpdotdev/common-skills's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on common-skills itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything common-skills configures →

not rated 636repo +6 today A scan Socket: passSnyk: warnSkillSpector: warn 52 tokens original MIT
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to warpdotdev/common-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/main/.agents/skills/pr-walkthrough/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pr-walkthrough

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pr-walkthrough

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/warpdotdev/common-skills/pr-walkthrough.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,260 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket pass 14 Sept 2026
  • Snyk warn 14 Sept 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 4 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 247
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 251
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 255
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 262
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00052 $0.06260
Opus 5.5 $0.00021 $0.02504
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.01252
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00626

Measured 1mo ago against content hash f5ae0fee833d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-walkthrough scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 2 executable files (scripts/d3_canvas_runtime.py, scripts/validate_d3_canvas.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/pr-walkthrough/SKILL.md · 305 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 305 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PR Walkthrough

Create a local static HTML/CSS/JavaScript walkthrough that orients a reviewer to the current branch's pull request as four separate interactive D3 views. The walkthrough should help the reviewer understand the affected code and the PR from four distinct views:

  • System overview view: a concise standalone code overview for the subsystem touched by the PR. It should not feel like a graph. Present it as a small set of expanded component cards that give the reviewer just enough architectural context to get their bearings before reviewing the PR. Do not mention the PR, changed files, review comments, diff links, screenshots, specs, or implementation deltas in this view.
  • Data flow graph: how state, data, events, requests, files, assets, or rendered output move through the changed system.
  • Code dependency graph: which changed components depend on each other, where the major seams are, and which files are entry points versus leaf dependencies.
  • User action graph: what the user does, what surface they interact with, and how that action flows through the implementation. This skill is an experiment in canvas-based PR comprehension. Do not reproduce the slideshow format. Do not put all perspectives on one graph. Generate four separate canvas views that the user can toggle between, and provide a guided tour within each view so the site teaches the PR from start to finish. Scale the walkthrough to the PR size: a small PR should feel like a compact reviewer aid, not a comprehensive architecture document. This skill is not a code-review skill. Do not generate new review findings, approve/request-changes recommendations, or exhaustive critique. Use the full codebase at the PR/head commit, the PR diff, PR description, specs changed by the PR, and existing review comments from humans or agents to produce orientation maps that help a reviewer understand the change quickly.

Output

Create a self-contained site at:

  • .warp/pr-walkthrough/index.html The site must be loadable directly from the local filesystem with a file:// URL. Do not require a dev server, package install, bundler, or build step. Prefer one self-contained HTML file with inline CSS, inline JavaScript, and inline data. If splitting files is unavoidable, use only relative local files and avoid fetch() because browser restrictions can block local file reads. D3 should be loaded from a pinned official release on a reputable CDN. Use the helper script's default unless there is a concrete reason to change it:
  • https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/d3.min.js Do not use unpinned latest URLs, unofficial builds, or dynamic package ranges. Do not show repeated D3 implementation disclaimers in the UI. Keep CDN/runtime details in validation logs or final caveats only when relevant. For reusable deterministic D3 rendering, prefer the helper script at scripts/d3_canvas_runtime.py. It emits Brandalf-aligned CSS, an inline runtime loader that defines the renderer before injecting the pinned D3 script, and a graph renderer with zoom, pan, graph switching, search, node details, fit-to-view, and guided tour controls. Use this helper rather than writing one-off D3 setup code in each generated walkthrough. The generated canvas must be treated as generated code that requires validation. Before reporting that a walkthrough is ready, run scripts/validate_d3_canvas.py against the generated HTML. If the canvas fails to initialize, D3 fails to load, required graphs are missing, tour controls do not work, nodes/edges do not render, or browser validation cannot be performed in an environment where it should be available, debug and regenerate before saying the walkthrough is ready. If a browser-capable environment is genuinely unavailable, report canvas rendering as unverified instead of ready.

Read the full file on GitHub · 305 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 305 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A f5ae0fee833d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-walkthrough is a skill published in the GitHub repository warpdotdev/common-skills (636 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 6,260 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens